headline questions

As has long been a tradition of the Intramuralist, every now and then I enjoy taking a quick glance at the nation’s headlines, just to get a pulse on what people are talking about. Also, of course, I enjoy the insightful questions embedded in those headlines.

(Remember: the question mark is the only punctuation piece that actually invites a response.)

Nonetheless, while on spring break, the following questions — which themselves served as actual headlines — got my attention:

“Whose Luck Runs Out in Final Four?”

“What If George W. Bush Spied on Obama in 2008?”

“Is Obamacare a Lifesaver?”

“Why Can’t Politicians Work Together?”

“When Is It OK for Democrats to Work with Trump?”

“What Do Republicans Do Now?”

“Is Russia America’s Enemy?”

“What’s Next for Gold, the Dollar, and the Stock Market?”

“Think Tax Reform Will Be Easy for Trump?”

“Does Believing in God Make You a Better American?”

“Why Is Water Sacred to Native Americans?”

“If Gorsuch Can’t Be Confirmed, Who Can?”

“Why Are Baseball Games So Darn Long?”

“Is a Secular America a Worse America?”

(… and perhaps my favorite — at least in the non-polarizing category…)

“Dancing With the Stars: Who Will Win Season 24?”

Let me always offer the freedom not to answer the questions; some questions, in fact, are impossible to answer. Some questions I simply don’t like.

But almost always, the asking and entertaining of a question is key to further understanding. Further understanding would be wise for us all…

… always.

Respectfully…

AR

 

“I’m so mad!”

Some of life’s most poignant lessons come from the least expected places. For me that often means coming from my youngest son, Joshua.

As said here many days, for those who believe special needs equates to some lesser quality of life, I contend you have not met my Josh. He is vibrant and sensitive and incredibly insightful; he, too, is often better with people than I.

One of the many things I admire about Josh is that he doesn’t hide his emotion. That doesn’t mean he takes it out on unfortunate others, but it does mean that when he’s happy, we all know it. When he’s excited, his enthusiasm brightens up everyone else in the room. And when he’s mad, he’s really mad. There is no doubt whatsoever.

We adults — well — we’re better at hiding things, being fairly well versed in managing the impressions we wish others to have of us. The sharing of emotions, though, is typically a higher priority for Josh than managing those impressions.

Last week, no less, Josh was mad.

Let me begin by explaining that Josh loves many things… from Batman and Disneyland, to nachos and mozzarella cheese sticks, to his two older brothers and Joey Tribbiani. And consistent with his emotional expression, when Josh loves something, that zestful glee is 100%, absolutely contagious. Yes, Josh’s love is contagious.

Note that one of the things on that list of things he loves is sushi. While we don’t get too into the raw fish or eely edibles, Josh loves creating a cold rice combo with a small vegetable and shrimp garnish, wrapped in seaweed, and topped with a modest crunch. Thankfully, Wednesdays are often “Sushi Day” at school.

But last Wednesday, he had a problem.

Someone had graciously decided to bless Josh’s special needs class with a thoughtful gift. They were bringing lunch to the entire class, purchasing Arby’s roast beef sandwiches for everyone in the room.

For over a week, in fact, Josh had expressed his joy that someone was bringing them Arby’s!

And he continued to express that joy… that is… until Wednesday morning when he awoke, realizing that the acceptance of the gift meant no sushi. Remember: Josh loves sushi.

He was ranting and raving and unquestionably grumpy.

“I am so mad!”

Such was a mere one of his angry refrains.

Allowing the authenticity of his expression to play out, I felt no need to squelch any emotion until he kept repeating himself with even more ratcheted up responses. His continued expression was causing him to lose focus.

“Josh,” I finally said, during one small break in the ranting. “Do you see what’s happening?”

He looked at me with those big blue eyes that kind of wanted to stay mad, but still keenly aware that he should at least listen to other potential sources of wisdom.

“You are so mad, your anger is keeping you from being thankful. Your anger is getting in the way of seeing and doing what’s right.”

To be clear, Josh did not become instantly happy; as noted, he’s not one to fake how he feels. But he was able to stop ranting, surrender his anger, go to school, and then offer his thanks. He was able to keep his anger from getting in the way.

Respectfully…
AR

 

very bad & blessed

So on Tuesday (follow my train of thought here, as we’ll eventually make our point)…
With minimal sleep and a totally swamped, exhausting day before, I awoke with two of my two and half bathrooms unusable. With my spouse out of town and carpet layers home instead for a substantial, two day project, the furniture in the soon-to-be carpeted rooms was temporarily stacked in the bathrooms. Note that when stacked from floor to ceiling, brushing one’s teeth becomes unviable and taking a shower, out of the question.

With the carpet crew and the paint crew both working steadfastly on this day — albeit in separate rooms — the only indoor area absent of contractors was a booth in my kitchen. Don’t get me wrong. I love my booth; but it was the only place in my entire home in which I could peacefully sit.

Strike that peacefully part… I knew there would be two days of this, overlapping the crews for some desired home improvements, and so on the previous day, I took my one year old pup to my favorite “doggie daycare,” so the noise of the stripping and pounding would not be cause for her to stir; however, Tuesdays are for small dogs only; my pup weighs 53 lbs.

So on Tuesday, my faithful Yogi stayed right where she typically does — by my side — which now included barking and barking and even more barking due the pounding of the carpet layers, who were not yet, her known friends.

I suppose I could have let her outside; granted, it had rained this morning.

At one point, the barking got the best of her. She took off all a sudden, slamming my left hand against a metal table. It hurt so much, tears immediately flowed. While I no longer think it’s broken, it remains swollen and available only for minimal use.

My son then called — couldn’t find his written excuse for the orthodontist. I had to then call both the school and the ortho.

“Time for lunch,” I thought. “I’ll sit down and find some comfort food.” Yet before taking my very first bite, I walked out to the garage to throw something away… until… when what to my wondering eyes should appear? My car, that was sitting in the garage all night, had a flat tire.

Geesh.

I admit: when initially considering penning a relevant post, my thoughts pretty much paralleled “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.” But somewhere amidst the pondering, I realized if I focused on what truly seemed a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day, I would miss any blessing.

I’ve seen a few blog articles swirling around cyberspace lately talking about use of the word “blessing” — or “blessed.” And mostly what I’ve seen has been an ardent admonition to quit using the word.

I disagree. We shouldn’t stop saying the word; we should instead start using it correctly.

Being “blessed” is not a matter of material fortune.
Being “blessed” is not a matter of prosperity, victory, or success.
Being “blessed” is not a matter of circumstance.

Even though my Tuesday was indeed a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day, I was still blessed…

I was blessed being able to interact and communicate with the ethnically diverse contractors in my home that day.
I was blessed that they would allow me to make them dinner, thankful for them using their skill and expertise in an area that I had none.
I was blessed by the kindness of the Good Samaritan who came to my house to fix the tire.
I was blessed by the prayers of friends who knew I was struggling.
And I was blessed by that special needs son, who told me before he left for school that day, “It’s ok, Mom. God’s got it all under control.”

Thank God my Tuesday didn’t keep me from seeing the blessing.

Respectfully…
AR

defining “neighbor”

As one who intends to always be an active student — recognizing there will forever be more to learn — I find myself consistently amazed at the truth embedded in stories of faith. I also find that for me, when I’m immediately rejecting of faith, sometimes that’s more about me and my own hangups than it is about any embodiment of truth.

One of the stories that continually challenges my core thinking is the infamous idea of “defining one’s neighbor.” Allow me to briefly share the scenario:

Just then a religion scholar stood up with a question to test Jesus. “Teacher, what do I need to do to get eternal life?”

He answered, “What’s written in God’s Law? How do you interpret it?”

He said, “That you love the Lord your God with all your passion and prayer and muscle and intelligence—and that you love your neighbor as well as you do yourself.”

“Good answer!” said Jesus. “Do it and you’ll live.”

Looking for a loophole, he asked, “And just how would you define ‘neighbor’?”

Jesus answered by telling a story. “There was once a man traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho. On the way he was attacked by robbers. They took his clothes, beat him up, and went off leaving him half-dead. Luckily, a priest was on his way down the same road, but when he saw him he angled across to the other side. Then a Levite religious man showed up; he also avoided the injured man.

“A Samaritan traveling the road came on him. When he saw the man’s condition, his heart went out to him. He gave him first aid, disinfecting and bandaging his wounds. Then he lifted him onto his donkey, led him to an inn, and made him comfortable. In the morning he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, ‘Take good care of him. If it costs any more, put it on my bill—I’ll pay you on my way back.’

“What do you think? Which of the three became a neighbor to the man attacked by robbers?”

“The one who treated him kindly,” the religion scholar responded.

Jesus said, “Go and do the same.”

The part of the story that challenges me is the question of who actually is my neighbor (… well… and, actually, the part about treating him kindly and going out and doing the same…).

But I think about that… “Who’s my neighbor?” Who are we called to be kind to that we struggle with — a question all active students must ask, regardless of adherence to any faith.

Am I kind to the person who looks differently than me?
Am I kind to the person who lives differently than me?
Am I kind to the person who believes differently than me?
Am I kind to the person who behaves differently than me?
Am I kind to the person who votes differently than me?

Am I kind to my neighbor? Or am I intentionally justifying withholding kindness from some?

The reason I find the above teaching so continually challenging, lies in the reality that I am not always kind. Sometimes I justify withholding kindness and respect because of differences in how others look, live, believe, behave, and vote.

Looks like remaining an active student is a wise choice after all.

Respectfully…
AR

true bracket challenge

I’d like to think I’m a reasonable, teachable person. I’d like to think when the truth presents itself, I could immediately accept it as true. I’d like to think that I never craft truth from a limited perspective, holding on so fiercely, that I fail to sift objectively through other valid perspective. Case in point — and please, please, I need great grace here, friends; it’s a sticky subject this time of year…

I speak, no less, about one small, public, co-ed university on the southeast side of Wilmington, North Carolina, only five miles from the Atlantic Ocean… the University of North Carolina at Wilmington (UNC-W)… and… of course, this year’s NCAA “March Madness” bracket.

Each year millions complete an empty bracket in the days leading up to the tournament. The beauty of a clean bracket/slate/etc. is that it allows us to aver whatever we wish. And so all sorts of persons select all sorts of teams to win all sorts of rounds in college basketball’s most popular, annual competition.

This year, NBA star Steph Curry predicts Duke will win it all. Charles Barkley picks Arizona. And both former Pres. Obama and country singer Tim McGraw think North Carolina will be victorious.

Each of the above may be right. But they won’t all be.

Due to my noted competitive nature, I, too, completed my bracket with a great sense of not-yet-fleeting hope. I ended up choosing the Wildcats of Villanova to repeat, with the awareness that winning two years in a row is an increasingly rare occurrence. As noted by yesterday’s results, I was totally wrong. But also noted in round one, came my awareness of manipulating the truth; let’s return to the UNC-W…

I’m a knowledgeable fan… semi-humble, perhaps, but knowledgeable nonetheless. And so I read and research and do my necessary homework.

In round one of the 64 seeded teams, 12th seeded UNC-W was set to face 5th seeded Virginia. Hence, simply based on the selection committee’s seeding, Virginia’s very capable Cavaliers/Wahoos/Hoos (all acceptable nicknames) were expected to win. They were perceived as the better team.

But picking upsets is part of the fun of the “madness.” I read other, reputable perspectives. From The Washington Post’s John Feinstein: “[Virginia] Coach Tony Bennett and his players know that the [UNC-W] Seahawks, champions of the Colonial Athletic Association, are one of those double-digits seeds that people see as a potential upset pick.”

From the Sporting News’ Mike DeCourcy: “No. 12 UNC Wilmington over No. 5 Virginia. In addition to the very cool nickname of ‘Seahawks’ – how many Wildcats do we need, people? – Wilmington has a terrific offense with four double-figure scorers led by guard C.J. Bryce and 3-point rifleman Denzel Ingram, who is top-20 in the nation in 3-pointers made. They’ve never seen anything like the Virginia defense, but they’re good enough to make this happen.”

So when I picked UNC-W over Virginia — even though varied opinion existed — I was not alone. I thus found comfort and confidence-building in those who shared my perspective.

After tip off, as I expected (and as I predicted), UNC-W took off, dominating the Cavaliers/Wahoos/Hoos. They were actually ahead by 15 points after only 12 and a half minutes of play. I was thinking pretty highly of myself. I was thinking I was right. But as the game went on, the Cavaliers/Wahoos/Hoos not only came back from the substantial deficit, but proceeded to lead most of the second half. It was close at some points, but Virginia was far more in command than UNC-W.

In those closer moments, even though I have zero relationship with either team — no exceptional like or dislike — I found myself actively cheering for the Seahawks of UNC-W (… grace, please, Wahoo fans). Yes, it’s fun to root for the underdog. But the other factor very much in play here (if I’m willing to admit it) is that I wanted to be right. And if UNC-W actually upset the talented team from Virginia, then I would be right and wouldn’t have to wrestle with the idea that part of my thinking was wrong. I wouldn’t have to wrestle with the validity of any other perspective.

Isn’t that part of our madness? Sometimes being right becomes more important than what may be true.

Respectfully…
AR

flyers, friars, and more

Oh, how I love this time of year…

We have Jayhawks and Cardinals and Catamounts and Ducks. (With all due respect…) What exactly is a “catamount”? (… a medium-sized wildcat, like a cougar, I’m told…)

Besides the birds listed above, we have heroic Cowboys and Spartans and all sorts of Trojans (and more Trojans… yes, we have two).

Yikes… I omitted a few avian competitors; we have soaring Seahawks, Bluejays, and Eagles, plus two sets of Gamecocks and Gaels. True, a Gael is not a bird; it’s a Gaelic-speaking person (… but thanks, Iona; it sounded good there…).

Let us not, however, discriminate against any, especially the by far, formidable animals in the tourney; we have multiple mammalian entries…

There are Wolverines and a Wolf Pack… Wildcats, too. Granted, most are familiar with our feline friends from Villanova, Kentucky and even Kansas State. But God bless Northwestern; welcome to the tournament. It really is the cat’s meow.

Forget we not, no less, the Bruins, Bisons, Bears, and smaller bears, i.e. the Bearcats. There are Bulldogs, also, hailing from both Butler and Gonzaga (that private university in Spokane,  enrolling approximately 8,000 students, in case you were unaware).

Truth told, I’d probably be a little more apprehensive about facing Jackrabbits instead of Terrapins, although I’m not quite sure how to feel about Hokies, Aggies, and Norse.

There are Commodores and Cavaliers…
Pirates and Privateers…
Mustangs and Musketeers…
And a tall order in the Mountaineers.

There are Fighting Hawks and Fighting Irish…
Flyers and Friars…
Blue Devils and Blue Raiders…
And Seminoles representing our respected Native Americans.

Also included are the talented sets of Tarheels and Tigers, Razorbacks and Rams, Badgers and Buccaneers.

And last but not least we have Golden Eagles, Golden Gophers, and even Golden Flashes. Since “golden” makes everything sound better, we also have hopefully golden Gators.

My apologies to the Demon Deacons. Again, with all due respect to my friends this time in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, I simply pay minimal attention to evil.

Wait… I did leave out my beloved Boilermakers. “All hail Purdue,” the song goes… (… so I’ve only sang it, maybe 37,142 times…).

All that to say I love this time of year. I love all the teams and people gathered, as we simultaneously celebrate the potential of the underdog and the talent of the top seeds. We appreciate each for who they are, enjoying them, recognizing that shining moments happen far more than once, for far more than one. There is so much in so many to enjoy.

Oh, how freeing.

Did I mention I love this time of year?

Respectfully…
AR

(P.S. Go Boilers go…)

25 Q’s

pete-nowicki-52585

It is no secret that the Intramuralist loves the question mark. It’s the only punctuation piece that invites an answer (… and we wonder why we keep conversationally shutting down one another…).

With a search spanning the pages of Facebook, Forbes, Readers’ Digest, and my own, etc. — recognizing that some of life’s questions are oft related to the thrill of victory or the agony of defeat — I found myself pondering the following…

… especially in regard to the current socio-political climate that is less than conversational… less than respectful… less than inviting… less than good…

(… yes… less than good…)

  1. What are the questions we each must answer?
  2. What am I pretending not to know?
  3. What are my values and am I being true to them?
  4. What — or who — am I living for?
  5. In what ways am I being perceived, that I’m not aware of?
  6. In what ways am I being deceived, that I’m not aware of?
  7. Do I honor the authorities in my life? Am I actually willing to acknowledge authority?
  8. Where are my blindspots?
  9. What is wrong with the world?
  10. How can what’s wrong be made right?
  11. Is money the root of all evil?
  12. What is the definition of evil?
  13. Where am I less than patient?
  14. Where am I withholding grace? From whom am I withholding grace?
  15. What don’t I know, that I don’t know?
  16. Would I be focusing on the same things today if I knew I was dying tomorrow?
  17. How would my role models act and carry themselves?
  18. Who is God and what does he ask of me?
  19. Is there anything within my control that I need to change today?
  20. Where have I been unkind?
  21. Where have I been discriminatory?
  22. Where have I been awful to the person who doesn’t think like me?
  23. Who has the right — and the ability — to judge?
  24. Where am I being judgmental? … and…
  25. What did I learn today?

(… hopefully something…)

Respectfully…
AR

best friends for a day…

suhyeon-choi-184100

[This is a tough day for the Intramuralist. But this post originally published in January of 2016 makes me feel a little better, as it’s one of my all time favorites. I apologize for the repeat; however, some stories are worth sharing far more than once…]

_____

A little less than a year ago, I had one of the best worst weeks of my life… as nothing prepares you for the passing of a loved one. Nothing. The only thing that makes the unbearable pain bearable is a faith that is grounded in wisdom and hope — and speaks of something greater than the circumstances at hand.

My younger sister passed away early that Monday morning. My family and I had long planned to fly to NYC on Thursday, as my teenage son and his talented show choir were set to dance on the prestigious, Lincoln Center stage on Friday. Hence, the celebration of Nicole’s life was moved to Sunday, which meant much travel (and even more emotion) packed into a few short days.

Unfortunately that Thursday morning, the undesired occurred again; in our midwest city of often sporadic weather, we were experiencing a blizzard-like storm that included over 9” of snow. Perhaps minor for our friends in Boston and Colorado Springs, 9” can be paralyzing in Cincinnati.

With the storm extending across the entire East coast, flights were being cancelled by the minute; one by one, we would hear disheartening news of another show choir family unable to make this once-in-a-lifetime trip. For some odd reason, our morning flight took off, relatively on time.

Save for my grieving heart, the flight itself was fairly smooth — that is, until we approached LaGuardia. We were immediately placed into an hour long holding pattern, as the airport had closed in order to plow the runways. Unbeknownst to us at the time, after that hour, the airport had actually reopened, but the first Delta flight attempting to land skidded right off the runway, crashed through a fence, and came to rest with the plane’s nose extending out over the adjacent bay of water. Thank God no life-threatening injuries occurred.

Needless to say, our Delta flight was then told the airport was closed. With the storm intensifying and more airports closing, we wondered if they would return us home. After more delay, we were told we would be landing at Bradley International — although most of us knew not where that was.

Once landed (in Hartford, CT, no less), we found ourselves in a sea of stranded others… so many questions and confusion. Airline reps attempted to be clear; maybe busses would come; maybe they could get us to our desired destination sometime today. There were too many “maybes.”

Yet there amidst the hundreds stranded, we were given a blessed gift. Three other show choir families were experiencing the same flight and plight: two sets of parents, one set of grandparents. We recognized one another, but previous to this moment, I did not know them well. We huddled, put our minds together, assessing our options.

Deciding to take things into our own hands, we walked and talked. As a group, we shared all this unexpected, significant emotion… the challenge of being diverted… the fear of being stuck… the concern for our friends traveling alternate routes… the empathy for our friends no longer able to come… and the worry for our kids, who were separately en route. There was so much deep, dichotomous emotion — almost too much to handle.

“Too much to handle” for me was all this on top of what had happened earlier in my week. Thus, thrust together in Connecticut — feeling simultaneously totally overwhelmed and profoundly grateful — I couldn’t help but share the more prevalent feelings permeating my heart, that which happened before we ever took off. The way those men and women then reacted to the news of my sister’s death was beautiful… the tears in the women’s eyes… the immediate hugs… the questions, the sincerity, and the genuine concern… They loved this then semi-stranger in a way that was meaningful, authentic, and true. Any differences did not matter. They became, as I like to say, my best friends for a day.

Several hours later, we finally made it to Manhattan. The time included multiple phone calls, prayers, selfies in the abandoned baggage claim area, a drink in the pub, and then a two/three hour, at-times-treacherous but fun-filled van ride before pulling into Times Square near 5:30 p.m. As we each exited the van, saying “see you tomorrow,” we hugged one another, unspeakably aware of all the emotion the day entailed. Those friends will always be uniquely, deeply dear to me — what a beautiful role they serve… my “best friends for a day.”

Respectfully… with peace, joy… tears, too…
AR

state of the government ’17

maria-stiehler-2219

For the last several years, the Intramuralist has published our annual “State of the Government” analysis in conjunction with the president’s annual State of the Union Address. Technically, tonight is not a State of the Union Address.

Pres. Trump is not bucking tradition; SOTU speeches are typically not offered until a sitting president has been in office for at least one year. It is then billed as a reflection of what they’ve done and a look forward at what’s next to do. 

So while the President’s speech is instead being called an “address to a joint session” this evening, the Intramuralist would like to proceed with our annual State of the Government analysis…

As repeatedly opined for several years now, the state of our government is “too partisan, too influenced by money, too big, too financially imbalanced, and too far removed from the Constitution.” With a pulse, too, of our current culture, let’s again focus on one embedded angle in that analysis which has become increasingly pronounced. One may remember it’s the singular angle that Pres. Obama acknowledged in his final SOTU last January as a “regret” of his tenure. Obama shared, “The rancor and suspicion between the parties has gotten worse instead of better.”

Exactly.

Too much rancor. Too much division. And too many fueling the division.

Part of the problem with the division seems to be that most of us like to blame anyone other than self. We are not very good at taking a tough look at ourselves, honestly reflecting upon how we individually contribute to the problem. Let’s be clear: the division is a problem… and we are far more comfortable pointing the finger elsewhere.

We point the finger at someone else’s…

  • Arrogance
  • Insults
  • Obstruction
  • Blindspots
  • Unwillingness to listen
  • And their lack of loving all people well.

We fail to look at our own…

  • Arrogance
  • Insults
  • Obstruction
  • Blindspots
  • Unwillingness to listen
  • And our lack of loving all people well.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… if we’re only loving and respecting the person who thinks like we do, then we are only loving and respecting some people well.

When we fail to love and respect all people, we are adding to the division.

In last year’s SOTG address, the Intramuralist shared our earnest, impractical desire to wave some unifying magic wand that could somehow end this growing, disturbing digression; that would no doubt be easiest. But perhaps the best place to start is not with any magic nor fictional tool or exercise that relies on something or someone else.

The best place to start is within each individual — putting away our pointing fingers and looking instead, inside of self.

How have I fueled the division?

Tough question. Tougher answer… albeit necessary.

Respectfully…
AR

freedom of the press infringement

natalia-ostashova-142764

In the polarized, political hot bed many seem to be lying in, the following story got the attention of many this weekend. As reported by Reuters:

“The White House excluded several major U.S. news organizations, including some it has openly criticized, from an off-camera briefing held by the White House press secretary on Friday, representatives of the organizations said.

Reporters for CNN, The New York Times, Politico, The Los Angeles Times and BuzzFeed were not allowed into the session in the office of press secretary Sean Spicer.

Spicer’s off-camera briefing, or ‘gaggle,’ replaced the usual televised daily news briefing on Friday in the White House briefing room. He did not say why those particular news organizations were excluded, a decision which drew strong protests…

Spicer’s decision drew a sharp response from some of the media outlets that were excluded.
‘Nothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties,’ Dean Baquet, executive editor of The New York Times, said in a statement.

‘We strongly protest the exclusion of The New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.’ “

The intentional omission of the press has troubling First Amendment implications. I feel that today. I felt it also in 2009…

As reported by Judicial Watch, eight years ago:

“Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has uncovered documents from the Obama Department of Treasury showing that the Obama administration, contrary to its repeated denials, attempted to exclude the Fox News Channel (FNC) from a round of interviews with Treasury’s ‘Executive Pay Czar’ Kenneth Feinberg. The documents, which include email exchanges within the Department of the Treasury and between Treasury and White House staff, also provide colorful evidence of an anti-Fox News bias within the Obama White House.

The documents, obtained last week by Judicial Watch pursuant to an October, 28, 2009, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, concern a series of interviews with Feinberg, who served as the Special Master for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Executive Compensation, on October 22, 2009, organized by the Treasury Department. According to press reports, the Fox News Channel was specifically excluded from joining the pool of reporters which precipitated a backlash among the networks and a reversal by the Obama Treasury Department…

Regarding general anti-FNC bias within the Obama White House in an October 23, 2009, email exchange between Jennifer Psaki, Deputy White House Communications Director and [Asst. Sec. for Public Affairs in the Treas. Dept., Jenni] LeCompte, Psaki writes, ‘I am putting some dead fish in the fox cubby – just cause’. In an email on the night of October 22, 2009, commenting on a report by Fox News Channel anchor Bret Baier noting the exclusion of the network from the pool, Psaki writes to LeCompte and fellow White House colleagues, ‘…brett baier just did a stupid piece on it — but he is a lunatic’.

Deputy White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest bluntly described the White House’s position on Fox News Channel in an October 23, 2009, email to LeCompte: ‘We’ve demonstrated our willingness and ability to exclude Fox News from significant interviews…’”

Personally, with all due respect, I believe the press should have equal access to our government officials, regardless of proven or perceived bias. I also believe our outrage (or lack of it) should be equal, regardless of administration.

Respectfully…
AR