One of the places my pondering lands me is that I think we keep encouraging collective cases of mistaken identity. We take all these good things in life \u2014 our appearance, gifting, gender, ethnicity, you-name-it \u2014 and instead of seeing them as beautiful ways we\u2019ve been wired, we see that as our actual identity. While beautifully diverse, it\u2019s not the same as who we are. Our identity comes from something more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s a ton on this topic \u2014 more than a singular, standard day\u2019s post. But I witnessed an insightful expression this week by Mary Harrington, an articulate author and researcher who\u2019s spent avid years not fitting into some culturally-crafted, binary box. She shares this book excerpt in The Free Press<\/em>, how feminism became her identity\u2026 and how she mistook freedom for feminism. This is fascinating, friends\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n * * * * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n I was born the year Margaret Thatcher came to power. My first political memory is the fall of the Berlin Wall. The reverberations, followed by glasnost and perestroika, marked the decade of my teens. For an average middle-class girl in 1990s Home Counties Britain, the big battles seemed to have been won, and the great disagreements of history settled. Progress was the backdrop to all we did; relative material comfort and safety could be taken for granted. And I firmly believed in feminism\u2019s capacity to bring about continued progress: after all, over the period between my grandmother\u2019s birth in 1914, and my own in 1979, women\u2019s lives had changed immeasurably for the better. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Studying critical and queer theory as an English Literature undergraduate at Oxford both confirmed and radically scrambled my faith in progress. At Oxford I was taught that language itself helps to shape meaning\u2014and, worse, that every \u201csign\u201d can only be defined in relation to other signs. In other words, we have no way of experiencing truth directly or objectively. How this related to the material world\u2014the pressures of survival or the demands of physical life\u2014was unclear.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n This mental shift sent me (to say the least) a bit loopy. Overnight, the hallowed buildings of Oxford University stopped looking like an expression of ancient traditions where I could find my place. Suddenly they were hostile incursions by something phallic, domineering, and authoritarian. I told a friend that I experienced the \u201cdreaming spires\u201d as \u201cbarbed penises straining to fuck the sky.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n I wish I could say this paranoid state passed swiftly. After I graduated, I carried a visceral aversion to hierarchies, a fierce defensiveness against anything that felt like someone trying to wield power over me, and a determination to make the world a better place. All this made me a less than ideal employee. I drifted through low-paying jobs, wrote unreadable novels, and tried my hand at anti-capitalism. This extended to my views on women. I\u2019d read Judith Butler\u2019s 1990 book, Gender Trouble, in which she argues that neither sex nor \u201cgender\u201d exist pre-politically, but instead are social constructs that we \u201cperform\u201d in a system that\u2019s imposed on us, and that we reimpose on ourselves and others by participating in it.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Disrupting this system seemed possible, perhaps for the first time, thanks to technology. In the heady early years of social media, it suddenly was easy to find others with similar interests. I experimented with drugs, kink, and nonmonogamous relationships. It felt possible to reimagine our genders and create supportive communities to realize our inner lives. I changed my name to Sebastian for a while. I pondered whether I really was female. It felt liberating, revolutionary, and unambiguously like the \u201cprogress\u201d I\u2019d always dreamed of.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n With friends, I founded a web start-up that aimed to disrupt education the way eBay had disrupted auctions. We hoped to make the world a better place and make ourselves a whole lot richer. And we somehow made it to first-round funding in East London\u2019s febrile \u201cSilicon Roundabout\u201d community.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet every egalitarian commune I drifted through turned out to be full of interpersonal power games. One likely common factor was me. Real egalitarian utopias may have been possible, just without me and my issues. But I don\u2019t think it was just me. Increasingly, too, I found the shifting constellations of romantic entanglements unsatisfying, and longed for a more enduring partnership. But I was skeptical of the political ramifications of doing so with a man. Would that not represent selling out?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2008 our start-up imploded (much as in the communes, I was a major contributing factor in the implosion), and so did the global economy, puncturing my fantasy of social challenges being solved through the creativity and dynamism of markets. I lost my social circle, my career, most of my convictions, and the majority of my identity. It took years to reassemble something like a workable worldview from the smoking ruins of my anti-hierarchical idealism. By the time I emerged in my mid-thirties, I was married to a man, no longer lived in London, and had qualified as a psychotherapist.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n And: I had a baby. Up to the point where I got pregnant, I\u2019d taken for granted that men and women are substantially the same apart from our biology, and \u201cprogress\u201d meant broadly the same thing for both sexes: the equal right to self-realization, shorn of culturally imposed obligations, expectations, stereotypes, or constraints.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The experience of being pregnant, and then a new mother, blew this out of the water. \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n * * * * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n I find myself sitting here with more questions than answers. But it\u2019s clear Harrington is a work in progress who sees something different now. Still beautiful, still diverse, but something more\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Respectfully\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n AR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One of the places my pondering lands me is that I think we keep encouraging collective cases of mistaken identity. We take all these good things in life \u2014 our appearance, gifting, gender, ethnicity, you-name-it \u2014 and instead of seeing them as beautiful ways we\u2019ve been wired, we see that as our actual identity. While … <\/p>\n