Seriously. Who\/what do you follow?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Those on Instagram, for instance, who have the most followers, are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My personal feed includes a few (far) lesser known personalities, such as Omgitswicks, the \u201cpart tour guide\/part wise uncle\u201d who provides hilarious sketch comedy focused on Florida nuances, and TJ Therrien, the middle child who showcases family therapy by amusingly exaggerating the differences in the oldest, middle and youngest child approaches.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But all that to make a singular point this day\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All of the above are known as who\/what we enjoy\u2026 we like\u2026 at the very least we\u2019re curious and want to pay attention them. Hence, we follow<\/em><\/strong> them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But my strong sense, with absolute all due respect to each of the above, is that current culture has diluted what it means to follow.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Whether it be a new diet, the Golden Rule or Jesus Christ, for example, to actually follow<\/strong><\/em> doesn\u2019t mean simply to enjoy, like or pay attention to. It doesn\u2019t mean being curious or behaving however we want to. To “follow” and “follow halfheartedly” are contradictory. To follow<\/em><\/strong>, friends, is to be wholly in. What we like or agree with are secondary to why we chose to follow the who\/what to begin with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Seriously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Respectfully\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n AR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Seriously. Who\/what do you follow? Those on Instagram, for instance, who have the most followers, are: My personal feed includes a few (far) lesser known personalities, such as Omgitswicks, the \u201cpart tour guide\/part wise uncle\u201d who provides hilarious sketch comedy focused on Florida nuances, and TJ Therrien, the middle child who showcases family therapy by … <\/p>\n