the cookie sabotage

Pension Jägerhof

I think we get so rattled up about the wrong things.

Please understand me. It’s ok to agree, disagree, or have an opinion. In fact, dare I say, it’s ok to express that opinion — albeit we could all do a little better job of articulating such in a way that doesn’t disrespect someone.

But sometimes possessing that opinion rattles us… we have to burst… we get so anxious or worked up inside about the behavior of someone else, we can’t let it go.

I’d like to see us all — well, ok, at least me — I’d like to do a better job letting it go.

Years ago, we used to visit my mother-in-law maybe three, four times a year. It was never as much as we — or perhaps she — would have liked, but she never complained. She always seemed just grateful to be with us. We lived four hours away from one another.

As typical especially on those weekends, she showed her love and thankfulness to us in so many varied ways… an added touch, maybe a surprise gift, or just very intentional, sweet conversation, often lasting late into the evening, when all parties were so obviously tired but also so obviously enjoying one another.

In the mornings, she’d typically still rise earlier than the rest (I’m thinking she probably slept for two days straight after we left) and make a feast for breakfast. She’d fill the table with this succulent smorgasbord of breakfast food — eggs, bacon, sausage, bagels, toast, donuts, muffins and more. We never left breakfast hungry.

There was one morning in my initial years as a parent that I wasn’t quite as comfortable in my own skin. I couldn’t have told you that at the time; I didn’t know what I didn’t know, and I was determined to be good at this parenting gig, committed to providing my kids with the necessary physical, emotional, and spiritual guidance and foundation that would allow for them to flourish as they go forward. There are a lot of things to cover in that!

As the breakfast meal was winding down, with everyone more full than perhaps we should be but ready for the day ahead together, my mother-in-law stepped away, off to the adjacent pantry, and brought one more, small tasty item to the table — this time, with an obvious added glee.

“Cookies!” she announced.

She always loved those chocolate Pinwheels, those fudge and marshmallow, Nabisco treats; she had found a package at the nearby grocery and couldn’t wait to share them with my children.

A wise response would have been one of empathy and gratitude — thankful that my mother-in-law wanted to bless our kids by sharing her joy, sharing something fun with her extended family.

Want to know what my immature reaction was? Remember I’m a new parent, wanting to do this well. But I didn’t realize how indignant I could be.

I could not believe that my mother-in-law would want to ruin her grandchildren’s eating patterns — my kids’ — by giving them all that sugar for breakfast! How could she? What was she thinking?! Why would she try to sabotage my honorable attempts to raise these kids right?! She was related to them, too!



In other words, I took my mother-in-law’s loving attempt as a personal offense. I could not see it for what it was because I was so focused on me and what I believed and wanted to do. I got totally rattled up. And I justified an offense when there was none. Let me say that again: I justified an offense when there was none.

Oh, I wish I would have known then what I know now. I wish my mother-in-law was still here, blessing our entire extended family with her simple, gracious and gleeful acts of kindness.

And I wish I would have realized it was ok for each of us to eat those Pinwheels… maybe even two.

Respectfully…
AR

hopes & crowns

photo-1457052271742-6b6b66887aeb

With the most frequent conversation this week posed somewhere along the lines of either (a) the relationship between patriotism and protest, (b) the right of free speech vs. disrespect of law enforcement and the military, and (c) the consistency within the combination of our public and private behavior, did you notice what we did not talk about?

There was no conversation centering on Clinton or Trump.
(Ah… it’s telling how refreshing that is…)

As no subject is intentionally avoided on our blog, allow me to share with you a bottom line observation: while there exist pockets of people here and there who are very excited about one of the above candidates (and a fewer number excited about Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson), the overall enthusiasm is significantly lesser for the entire 2016 presidential field. Gallup has been consistently reporting significant lows for all in response to agreement with the statement that “there is a candidate running who would make a good president.”

Personally, I have peace regardless. Why? Because we are electing a “president” — not attempting to discern who is God nor crowning some kind of king or queen. That gives me peace.

Recently, no less, while on my recent respite, one guest writer shared a delayed entry with me. While the expressions of another may or may not be held by the Intramuralist, I appreciate his genuine offering of hope. Hope, my friends, is part of what we all crave. He suggested the following commentary regarding our choice this coming November:

“I’m watching this election season with both despair and at the same time some amount of hope. The despair is obvious because both of the candidates at the top of the tickets are so tainted that we will need to take a collective bath as a nation after it the dust settles. The first candidate is obviously qualified by virtue of being in the inner sanctum for so long with different roles (First lady, Senator, Secretary of State). To deny those credentials would not be part of an honest dialog. Yet it is because of the being in the inner sanctum that I’m afraid she has learned how to use the system to benefit herself and other family members. Not to mention the obvious benefits for her friends and colleagues who defend her regardless of the action or even possible crimes committed – yes, I said ‘possible crimes.’ But the media will find a way to excuse it, because it is ‘only money’ just like it was seemingly ‘only about sex’ in the 90’s.
 
The other candidate has had by most objective assessment great success in the business world and obviously can and seemingly will fight anyone (he took out 16 mostly capable opponents in the primary). It is the latter part of that aspect of him that scares most of his critics. Or are they really afraid that might make him win the general election, as well? I personally like a fighter, but I always want the fight to be with dignity and a good grasp of the subject knowledge. I grew up in New York City, so I understand the swagger one has to have in order to survive the tough streets of South Jamaica (where I grew up) or the corporate offices of Wall Street (where I have worked). I get it, I get it. But when you are on the national stage, you better realize that mom and pop in Cheyenne, WY or Duluth, MN may not quite understand that swagger. You are speaking to a national audience that doesn’t always ‘get it.’ I grew up with guys who all thought they were wise guys (regardless of ethnicity). All those guys today have mellowed. I’m hoping what I have seen in the last week that this guy, too, can mellow so people can hear the message he has.
 
So where is the hope you ask? Well, I do believe that we are truly one nation under God, and we will survive this as we have every other election cycle. As Paul said to the Corinthians in II Corinthians (not ‘Two Corinthians’ – sorry I couldn’t resist), ‘We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed. Always be hopeful.’”

Always be hopeful. That’s something we each can wrap our minds around.

So where does your hope come from? From a president, king, or queen?

Let’s hope not.

Respectfully…
AR

the world is not our stage

photo-1466584820433-9ad1cc6798f3

With the recent acts of questionable protest and patriotism, it got me thinking. (Ok, true — I think a lot.) But I return to where this week’s conversation started: what are we focused on?

Many are focused on the NFL quarterback who refuses to stand for the national anthem.

For some, the reaction is disgust. For a seemingly lesser few, it’s a “way to go.” For most, no less, it seems a “you have that right, but that’s the wrong way to show it” (… see Kaepernick, birthmother…).

With Colin Kaepernick suggesting his motive is to support African-Americans and people of color, It causes me to think about how we best support other people — the way in which our support and good deeds are done… the way in which we make a significant difference.

Kaepernick — and let me add a semi-subtle caveat here, as my perspective is so limited, and I have no desire to be judgmental — but Kaepernick has said he is protesting until people of color are no longer “oppressed” and until the flag means what it “should.” He has a right to that expression; and we each have a right to agree or disagree with his behavior.

I wonder about that behavior. I mean, is this all he does?

Again, let me not be judgmental. But I wonder… he sits when all eyes are on him. When the world is watching, he takes a stand of support. So what does he do when the public is not watching?

… does he get involved? … does he volunteer? … does he invest in community relations? … does he utilize his celebrity status to bring police and various ethnic communities together?

And… does he use any of his $19 million salary to support the causes for which he says he is passionate?

In other words, are his public and private behavior aligned?

One of the things I appreciate is how so much of the ancient scriptures have become accepted truth. We don’t always recognize that — and sometimes, we fight against them, wanting to figure wisdom out on our own a bit — but typically, we find wisdom already, generously provided. When I focus on the big picture here, the following wisdom comes to mind:

“Be especially careful when you are trying to be good so that you don’t make a performance out of it. It might be good theater, but the God who made you won’t be applauding.

When you do something for someone else, don’t call attention to yourself. You’ve seen them in action, I’m sure — ‘playactors’ I call them — treating prayer meeting and street corner alike as a stage, acting compassionate as long as someone is watching, playing to the crowds. They get applause, true, but that’s all they get. When you help someone out, don’t think about how it looks. Just do it — quietly and unobtrusively. That is the way your God, who conceived you in love, working behind the scenes, helps you out.”

The world, my friends, is not our stage.

We are not the stars.

We have been blessed with communities and cultures that provide beautiful opportunity to support and sharpen one another. We need to help the least of these. We need to support and care for one another, especially the oppressed.

Some will say, no doubt, that Kaepernick is doing good by utilizing his celebrity as leverage. There’s a valid point in that; he’s getting people’s attention. That then is where how he spends his time and money also comes into question.

Am I consistent in how I care for others? Are my public and private behaviors consistent with one another?

Or… am I utilizing the world as my stage?

Respectfully…
AR