the king

He’s here!  He’s here!

 

The future king is here!

 

Granted, Prince William and Kate Middleton’s baby was initially nameless, but the newborn babe has now been pronounced as none other than Prince George Alexander Louis; note that William’s name went unannounced for one whole week while his father, Charles, actually waited an entire month.  Regardless, a king is born!

 

Interestingly, this week my youngest teen strolled into my room, and via a manner of not so eloquent words asked, “What’s the big deal“ about England’s most recent royal birth.

 

He’s a king!  The king has been born!

 

[As originally penned in early 2009…]

 

People historically clamor for a king.

 

The Romans clamored for the great Cincinnatus.  The Sicilians clamored for “the General,” Giuseppe Garibaldi.  And lest you are on the edge of your seats, ready to pounce, thinking I may again address the perceived, first term Obama, Greek-columned, kingly adoration, we should acknowledge that many have been equally guilty with the elections of previous presidents…  “Now that a conservative Christian is in the White House… now we can finally save America!”

 

Yes, the king will save us!

 

In approximately 1050 B.C., the ground swelling rose to its maximum voice.  The people had spiritual leaders, men and women to guide them, helping them see the world rightly and give God credit for his creation, but they didn’t have a “king.”  “Give us a king to rule us!” the people fervently chanted.  “If only we had a king, those hopes would ring true.”

 

The citizens were told that a king could not save them; a king would be ineffective…  incapable.  A king could not do what only God can do.  We should never put more faith in one man than in the one who created man.  But yet, the people continually ignored wisdom.  They continued to mandate, “We want a king so we can be like everyone else!”  Adhering to the wants of the people as opposed to the wisdom of one greater, the leading prophet of the land surrendered to their wishes.  Yet he eerily added, “The day will come when you will cry in desperation because of this king you so much want for yourselves.  But don’t expect God to answer.”  Because their trust was displaced, their prayers were also discarded.

 

No one man (or woman or even a Hillary) can save America.  No conservative Christian.  No liberal, independent, franchise quarterback, or even global warming aficionado.  No man can do what only God can do.  So why, as a people, do we continue to look for love in all the wrong places?  What makes us clamor for a king?

 

God bless you, William and Kate.  You’re the closest thing to royalty with whom most of us will ever identify.  We loved Diana.  She was authentic.  She could relate to us, but her death came so suddenly, so tragically.

 

So c’mon, William and Kate… raise that child well.  Here, then, is to Prince George — third in line for the royal throne.

 

We need a king, you know.

 

… or at least, for some reason, we think we do…

 

 

AR

ESPN news

To hear the sportswriters tell it, it was “the best round of his life”… “a most improbable win”… “completed in stunning, awe-inspiring fashion”…

 

On Sunday, golf’s most popular lefty, Phil Mickelson, captured the coveted Claret Jug, as the winner of this year’s British Open.  He was 5 strokes behind the leader when the day began, and as one writer penned, “Mickelson barely got a mention on the broadcast.”

 

Before we continue, friends, let me offer an initial, concise caveat.  While the Intramuralist is without question a lover of sports, this is not a sports post.  Not at all.  In fact, with all due respect to the male members of my extended family, I’m actually not incredibly passionate about watching that little white, dented ball be smacked around on the grass all day.  Play and partake?  Gladly.  Watch 4 hours on TV on a regular, weekend basis?  No way.  It’s just a little (ok, maybe a lot) too slow a sport for me.

 

Being that sports lover, however — and living in a household uniquely dominated by testosterone — it’s rather important that I am “up on” and equally knowledgeable regarding all that occurs in the athletic world; we have some great conversations around our house.  Hence, I subscribe to regular sports updates from ESPN, the unquestionably successful Entertainment and Sports Programming Network.  Throughout the British Open, they sent me multiple daily texts, alerting me to the Open’s current status.

 

Here’s the non-sport-aspect challenge…

 

All 4 days of the British Open, ESPN sent me updates about Tiger Woods.  Tiger was never in the lead.  He spent most days somewhere around 6th place.  But every text from the sporting news network — save for when Mickelson finally seized the lead — included information about Tiger Woods.  In fact, going into Sunday’s final round, when Tiger had crept to a then current second place tie, the person with whom Woods was actually tied with was omitted from ESPN’s tweets.  ESPN’s British Open tweets were always focused on Tiger Woods, regardless of who was performing better.

 

My “a-ha” moment came somewhere between rounds 3 and 4…

 

Does ESPN think I only care about Tiger Woods?

Why are they so seemingly fascinated with him?

Who then is deciding what is “news”?

Is the network deciding for me what’s newsworthy — even if it’s not?

 

I wonder.

 

I wonder how often media outlets dictate our news.

 

Are there times the media omits relevant information because of what they feel will gain greater ratings?  … a larger audience?  … and increased revenue?  Are they, then, actually dictating what is “news”?

 

For the record, the answer is Hunter Mahan.  Hunter Mahan was the professional golfer tied with Tiger heading into the fourth and final round of this year’s British Open.

 

Note:  the Intramuralist will never intentionally omit a relevant detail in order to sway your response.  We will not be the decider — nor, uh, the manipulator — of what is actually news.

 

Respectfully,

AR

advice column

In 2 intriguing developments…

 

John Rosemond has written a nationally syndicated parental advice column for years.  In addition to his column, Rosemond has authored multiple bestsellers, such as Parenting by the Book and Making the ‘Terrible’ Twos Terrific!  When responding recently to a question of how to handle their “highly spoiled underachiever” son, Rosemond advised the parents to strip the boy’s room down to essentials, take away electronic devices, and suspend privileges until the boy’s grades improved.

 

The State of Kentucky — specifically, the Kentucky Board of Examiners of Psychology – then declared that by offering such one-on-one advice, Rosemond is engaging in the “practice of psychology” – something he is not entitled to do in the state since he lacks a Kentucky license, as even though he is a nationally syndicated columnist, his North Carolina credentials are not valid in Kentucky.

 

The bottom line:  the government says a citizen is not qualified nor allowed to do what he does without the government’s supervision, authorization, and approval.

 

Steve Cooksey, no less, is a blogger from North Carolina.  He encourages others, prompted by the passion of his own experience.  Listen to Cooksey’s brief bio:

“To summarize my story, I was an obese, sedentary, recently diagnosed diabetic when I began this journey.  I was on diabetes, cholesterol, and hypertension drugs as well as taking 4 insulin shots per day.  But within days things began to change and within a few months, I WAS A NEW PERSON!” 

Cooksey’s health improved drastically due to utilization of the growingly popular, high-protein Paleo Diet.

 

Yet alas, the State of North Carolina — specifically, the North Carolina Board of Dietetics/Nutrition — told Cooksey the advice-like language throughout his blog — and his offering of personal support to those attempting to transition to a “Paleo” lifestyle — were illegal.  Let me say that again:  illegal.

 

The bottom line:  the government says a citizen is not qualified nor allowed to do what he does without the government’s supervision, authorization, and approval.

 

Interestingly, both Rosemond and Cooksey have sued the government on the grounds of free speech and the First Amendment.  Let me also add that I’m certain there exist aspects in each case that we don’t know.  My prayer regardless is that their ongoing cases will be heard and directed by wise, fair-minded persons.

 

However, what concerns me is the potential precedent and lingering questions…

 

Is only government able to decide who is qualified?

Is only government able to decide who is allowed?

 

I wonder… in the future… if not in possession of a state teaching license, will parents be deemed qualified to teach their own children?  Will they be allowed?

 

I have no idea whether the words and wisdom of Rosemond and/or Cooksey are actually wise or not; the potential precedent, however, of the government’s increasingly intrusive, larger role disturbs me.

 

What if the citizens’ words are not wise?  Does the government still need to control that?  Are only wise words allowed to be shared?  And is only the government capable of determining what wisdom is?  Must they supervise? … authorize?  … and approve? …

 

… Be honest.  Be kind.  Love people well.  Never run from truth.  Don’t be afraid of the hard stuff.  Be respectful.  Be compassionate.  Say what you mean and mean what you say.  Forgive.  Forgive again.  Figure the faith thing out.  Don’t spend what you don’t have.  Exercise.  Ponder.  Reject hypocrisy.  Be humble.  Laugh often.  Make good friends.  Be loyal.  Invest.  Embrace your family.  Love through thick and thin.  Enjoy ice cream in the summer.  And read the Intramuralist faithfully.

 

There.  There’s my advice for today.  It’s free.  You’ll have to discern whether or not it’s wise.  Actually, that’s our job.

 

Respectfully,

AR

racist

Sometimes as I witness society’s reaction, my soul is left disturbed.

 

Perhaps like several of you, I have turned off the television after my jaw dropped too many times watching reaction to George Zimmerman being found “not guilty” of the murder of teen Trayvon Martin.  Was he really “not guilty”?  Was he “guilty”?!  I don’t know.  I wasn’t there.  I wasn’t even in the courtroom.  Like positions, however, have not kept others from adamant declarations.

 

The reality is that Trayvon Martin’s tragic death has evolved into an issue of race.  It shouldn’t be.  The question should be whether or not a criminal act took place.  However, declarations of innocence and guilt have seemingly since been driven more by ethnicity than on evidence — or the lack of it.

 

Does skin color matter?

 

Unfortunately, to too many, it does…

 

… it matters to the female convenience store clerk, shown on a YouTube video, who told an African-American pastor, “We don’t serve your kind”…

… it matters to the Illinois, African-American man who beat up an American caucasian because he was so mad at “white boys”…

… it matters to CNN’s Nancy Grace, who during jury deliberations, said “[Hispanic Zimmerman’s been] out on bond, driving through Taco Bell every night, having a churro.”

 

It matters to too many whites… too many blacks… too many Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, etc.  Unfortunately, it matters.

 

My current sense is that most of the protests after the Zimmerman verdict were peaceful.  (Note:  the most sensational moments — however infrequent — receive the most media attention.)  Still, seemingly intelligent (and not so intelligent) persons say disturbing things…

 

For example, in response to the verdict, an associate professor at the typically esteemed, Ivy League’s University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Religious Studies called God a “white racist.”  Excuse me, but this professor who is teaching our children, is she attempting to divide — or to heal unite?

 

I look forward, friends, to a day when skin color truly does not matter to any of us… when it doesn’t matter to the whites, to the blacks, to every other color God created.  I look forward when there exists no justified prejudice — stemming either from initial ignorance or from retaliatory response.

 

I look forward to the lion laying down with the lamb… the leopard lying down with the goat… the cow feeding alongside the bear and their young lying down together.  I look forward to a day when none of the external “stuff” we so passionately cling to matters, when none of us judge by what we see with our eyes or hear with our ears.  I look forward to us being directed more by a Spirit of wisdom and understanding than by skin color and self.

 

I look forward to that day.  For each of us.  All of us.  Only then will skin color truly not matter.

 

Respectfully… always…

AR

Martin & Zimmerman

This is a post I have little desire to pen.

 

It’s not that the Intramuralist fails to possess an opinion.  It’s not that I don’t have all the answers.  I rarely have all the answers.

 

I hesitate to write about the George Zimmerman verdict because so many of the responses have been so emotional…

 

Amidst the current outrage, much has been omitted.  Such as…

 

… “not guilty” is not equal to completely “innocent”…

… mercy always triumphs over judgment…

… the withholding of forgiveness only hurts the withholder…

… few of us were in the courtroom…

… and fewer still were there when the altercation occurred.

 

We don’t know what happened that fateful night.  We don’t know what Trayvon Martin said.  We don’t know what Zimmerman said.  We don’t know if there were threats by either.  We don’t know if either Martin or Zimmerman felt they were in danger of bodily harm.  We don’t know for certain who was screaming for help on the 911 call.  That’s the bottom line:  we don’t know.

 

I wish more would pause, recognizing exactly that:  they don’t know.  Just because Martin was an African-American and Zimmerman is a white Hispanic tells us nothing about innocence nor guilt.

 

But instead of the prudent pause, many embrace the far easier rush to emotional judgment — which is what seems to prompt the Rev. Al Sharpton to plan national protests this Saturday… which is what seems to motivate multiple liberal churches and organizations to announce a standing in solidarity with Martin and his family only, ignoring the Zimmermans…  and which seems to cause the NAACP to demand the Justice Dept. file federal civil rights charges against Zimmerman…

 

Did these persons and organizations forget that they weren’t there?

 

I understand the emotion, friends.  The death of Trayvon Martin was tragic.  It was awful.  No teen should die an early death.  Yet the outrage omits more truth than Rev. Sharpton & Co. currently care to admit… and that the media made significantly worse…

 

Soon after the altercation, for example, NBC’s “Today” show aired the following tape of Zimmerman’s initial comments to a police dispatcher.  This is what NBC reported…

 

Zimmerman:  “This guy looks like he’s up to no good.  He looks black.”

 

It was later acknowledged that NBC News altered the recording; the full tape went like this…

 

Zimmerman:  “This guy looks like he’s up to no good.  Or he’s on drugs or something.  It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.” 

Dispatcher:  “OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?”
Zimmerman: “He looks black.”

 

The death of Trayvon Martin is unquestionably tragic.  I pray for his family.  I also pray for George Zimmerman and his family.  The current outrage that omits both logic and truth — and only empathizes with one of the involved families — is equally, unfortunately sad.

 

Respectfully,

AR

my bro’

Yesterday my younger brother got married.

 

My family is both thankful and proud.

 

In preparation for today, the officiating pastor asked us siblings what qualities we most admire in our brother.  There’s lots I could say about Stun.

 

He’s witty…

He’s wise…

He’s athletic…

He’s strong…

He’s God-fearing…

He’s God honoring…

He’s loyal and faithful…

When he isn’t multi-tasking at all those activities he is so good at, he’s an excellent listener and a cherished friend.

It’s fun to be “on the other end of Stun.”

 

Let me also say this…

 

Stun is an elected politician.

 

I’ll add this…

 

Stun is the kind of person that should be an elected politician.

 

I humbly opine such because Stun is a man of integrity.  He’s authentic; he’s real.  His “yes” means “yes” and his “no” means “no.”

 

He doesn’t toe the line if it violates his moral compass; in other words, he doesn’t vote a specific way simply because someone tells him — or expects him — to.  Friends, that is the kind of person we need in office.  That is the kind of person who actually represents us well.

 

We don’t need any more persons in office who simply cast a robotic ballot, prompted by political engrainment and special interest paybacks.  We don’t need any more persons in office who spend and spend with no specific, measurable plan to pay it back.  We don’t need any more persons in office who give great speeches, but still seem only to care for small percentages of the country.  We don’t need any more persons in office who are prideful and arrogant — or who only listen to the likeminded.  We don’t need any more persons in office who only listen to themselves.  We need persons in office who are ethical, humble, teachable, smart, God-fearing, and without a doubt, men and women of integrity.

 

My brother got married yesterday.

 

I’m so proud of him.

 

Proud of him in office.  Prouder still of who he is.

 

Respectfully,

AR

woe is me

When bad things happen, how do we respond?  With a woe-is-me attitude?  Believing, alas, that we are the victim?  Or what if we really are the victim?  … do we get angry?  … indignant?  … or an emboldened “it’s me against the world” mentality?

 

Truthfully, I can understand that.  I just don’t think it’s typically the wisest mentality to cling to so closely.

 

Note the freeing, contagious example of Michelle Knight…

 

Michelle Knight, 32, is one of the 3 young women who was kidnapped and trapped in Cleveland for the past 10 years.  Her captor, Ariel Castro, reportedly starved and punched Knight until she miscarried during her decade-long ordeal.  She suffered such severe beatings while locked up that she actually may need facial reconstruction surgery.  Make no mistake about it:  she is a victim.

 

(Alas, woe is me.)

 

Yet on Monday, Knight together with her kidnapped companions, Amanda Berry and Gina DeJesus, released a video to the public on YouTube.  Knight’s words were striking.  Even more so was the wisdom that shaped and girded her chosen mentality…

 

With her voice at times seemingly frail and faltering, the so-called “victim” still amazingly shared the following:

 

“Thank you everyone for your love, support, and donations, which helped me build a brand new life. I just want everyone to know I’m doing just fine.

 

I may have been through hell and back, but I am strong enough to walk through hell with a smile on my face, and with my head held high and my feet firmly on the ground. Walking hand in hand with my best friend, I will not let the situation define who I am.  I will define the situation.

 

I don’t want to be consumed by hatred.  With that being said, we need to take a leap of faith and know that God is in control.  We have been hurt by people, but we need to rely on God as being the judge.

 

God has a plan for all of us.  The plan that He gave me was to help others that have been in the same situations I have been in, to know that there’s someone out there to lean on and to talk to. I’m in control of my own destiny, with the guidance of God.

 

I have no problem expressing how I feel inside.  Be positive, learn that it’s important to give than to receive.  Thank you for all your prayers.  I’m looking forward to my brand new life. Thank you.”

 

Michelle Knight doesn’t deny nor dismiss the reality of what happened to her.  She also does not blame nor discount the existence of God.  In fact, she incredibly still sees God’s plan — and knows it will still somehow be good.

 

She doesn’t take the law into her own hands.  She hasn’t become indignant.  And she refuses to justify hate.  She won’t give in to the negative.  Knight is positive and hopeful.  And thus, her message is contagiously inspiring… so much more inspiring than any “alas” or “woe is me.”

 

Respectfully,

AR

Zimmerman trial

Currently ongoing in central Florida, George Zimmerman is on trial for 2nd degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin.  Here are the facts, as told by CNN:

 

Trayvon Benjamin Martin, born February 5, 1995, was a 17-year-old African-American high school student who lived in Miami Gardens, Florida with his mother Sybrina Fulton.  In February 2012, Martin was visiting his father, Tracy Martin, in Sanford, Florida after receiving a ten-day suspension from Krop Senior High School.  The suspension stemmed from the discovery of drug residue in Martin’s book bag.

 

George Michael Zimmerman, born October 5, 1983, was a part-time student at Seminole State College and a neighborhood watch captain at the Retreat at Twin Lakes gated community in Sanford at the time of the shooting.  He is married to Shellie (Dean) Zimmerman and is the son of Robert and Gladys Zimmerman.


February 26, 2012 – George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch captain in Sanford, Florida, calls 911 to report “a suspicious person” in the neighborhood.  He is instructed not to get out of his SUV or approach the person.  Zimmerman disregards the instructions.  Moments later, neighbors report hearing gunfire.  Zimmerman acknowledges that he shot Martin, claiming it was in self-defense.  In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith writes that Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and back of the head.

 

Leading up to the physical encounter between the two, Martin talked to his girlfriend, while  Zimmerman talked to a 911 dispatcher…

 

What happened next is a matter of dispute. Martin and Zimmerman were obviously in the middle of it, but no one else saw all that happened.  One witness later told police that “she heard a commotion, which sounded like arguing,” while another mentioned “loud talking.”

 

And on one 911 call, placed by a neighbor, a police sergeant counted one man yelling “help!” or “help me!” 14 times in a span of 38 seconds.

 

Who was yelling?  When the 911 calls were later played back for him and he was asked if they were from his son, an emotional Tracy Martin “quietly responded ‘no’.”  But an FBI analysis, also detailed on Thursday, said it couldn’t be determined whose voice it was due to the “extreme emotional state” of whomever was yelling, a lack of words from which to compare, overlapping voices and “insufficient voice quality” on the recording.

 

Then at the trial last week, each mother of the men involved testified that the desperate voice on the other end of that phone was that of their son…

 

Zimmerman acknowledged shooting Martin but said it was in self-defense.  Attorneys for Martin’s family have accused Zimmerman of racially profiling Martin and shooting him “in cold blood.”

 

Hence, here is our challenge…

 

First, let’s acknowledge that regardless of motive or responsibility, this situation is tragic.  A teenager died.

 

Second, let’s also acknowledge that since only the 2 men were there, only the 2 of them know fully what happened.

 

The challenge?  Martin was an African-American.  Zimmerman is a white Hispanic.  Would this situation be handled the same — by the media, law, and families involved — if the color of Martin and Zimmerman’s skin was the same?

 

Sadly… that’s a great question.

 

Respectfully,

AR

reaction time

I witnessed the wildest thing over the weekend.  Ok, so it wasn’t exactly wild, but the reaction certainly was.  It was one of those moments where you watch life unravel so slowly, it seems — like you see what’s happening, can tell what will happen next, you know it isn’t going to be good, and yet, you can do nothing to stop it.

 

En route to my oldest son’s baseball game, my other 2 sons and I were killing a little time prior to the game’s start.  We had stopped at the local grocer just off the main highway in rush hour traffic.  It was a four lane highway with no median but a shared, center left turn lane.

 

A black sedan was heading north in the actual turn lane, while a smaller 4 door Ford was coming swiftly from the opposite direction, seemingly also looking to turn, but seemingly also indecisive as she was not yet in the shared turn lane.  In other words, both the black sedan and 4 door Ford were wanting to be in the same place at the same time.  With full traffic at a 6 p.m. pace, there was minimal room to maneuver and even less time to make the decision.

 

The driver of the Ford then made the fateful choice to turn in front of the sedan.  Watching from the nearby grocery lot, it was painstakingly clear such was not a wise decision.

 

The crash was both loud and immediate.  The front of the Ford was ripped off in an instant, as auto fluids quickly flooded the freeway.  There seemed little question of whether or not the car was totaled.

 

In that eerie silence after a car crash — when the shock of the unexpected meets the reality of needing to deal with it — the driver’s door opened on the now totaled Ford.  Out jumped a young, shoeless girl — a girl no more than 17/18 years old.  She instantly filled the space of the silence.

 

The young girl sprang out the door, began jumping up and down, waving her arms, screaming.  She was screaming so loud it was the only sound to be heard.  My heart stopped; for a moment I wondered if someone else had accompanied her — and perhaps that person was injured — but such was not the case.  She was alone.

 

The girl continued jumping, continued screaming, and then she proceeded to start running up and down the street… first through that not-to-be-shared center lane… then actually running across the rush hour lanes… then up and down the adjacent sidewalks.   The screams and hysterics continued until the sights and sounds of rush hour traffic resumed and drowned out the air space.  The young teen was hysterical, mad, and possibly also in shock.

 

Let me first say that even as an eyewitness, there is so much I don’t know.  I don’t know if she had insurance or if she was down to her last dollar or if she deceptively took her parents’ vehicle without their knowledge.  Even though I saw the action unfold, I do not know the entire substance of her screams.

 

I thus learned 2 things from the encounter…  First, even an eyewitness is incapable of making all conclusions.  Second, how often (and God bless the young girl…) but how often do we react hysterically to the bad things that happen in our lives, forgetting that so many others have it far worse?  I wonder if sometimes we are so focused on our own experience that we react in an extreme way, forgetting it could be worse… forgetting there’s always much to be thankful for.

 

There’s one more thing I learned this day…  Tough circumstances — scenarios we can’t control — can happen in an instant; hence, we shouldn’t take any day for granted.  If we truly knew that, such perspective would undoubtedly, dramatically affect our reaction.

 

Respectfully,

AR

independence

As fireworks flare across the nation this day, we acknowledge the 4th of July.  We celebrate Independence Day, the day 237 years ago when America declared her intentional independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain.  As infamous patriot, John Adams, penned a day prior:  “… I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival.  It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty…”

 

Adams went on to encourage a “solemnization” that included pomp and parade, guns and games, and a serious yet festive acknowledgement.  I wonder what he would think of our country’s celebrations and acknowledgements today.

 

I’m a little stunned, friends.  We claim to cherish our independence, and on one hand, perhaps we do; we also so quickly contradict ourselves.

 

As discussed previously this week, we crave the right to individually discern the path that seems best to us.  But yet so many of us ‘cravers’ still clamor for government to choose the path for another.

 

As a current example, it is no secret that the Intramuralist is not a fan of Obamacare.  After reading the bill, my strong sense was that it’s an economic burden and holds huge potential for future corruption. However, here is a bill that mandates individual behavior.  How does that fit with a country that boldly claims its independence?  The only way the bill pays for those who cannot is to mandate that all pay.  Something within that logic seems to contradict a free, democratic society where we choose our own paths.

 

Even more contradicting, unfortunately, as we examine the heart of the decades old Declaration, is what we are actually acknowledging.

 

The Declaration of Independence was clear.  All men are created equal with certain, unalienable rights “endowed by their Creator.”  God’s presence and reality were never in question and never excused.   God was acknowledged regularly and consistently.

 

And yet today, while again on one hand we wish to choose the path that individually seems best to us, many often want to silence the individual who chooses to credit their Creator.  Friends, if we want to choose our own path, we must allow others to do the same.  That means allowing and respecting those who praise the name of the living God.

 

I shudder when I think of the movement in this land to remove any public acknowledgement of the God of the universe.  I shudder when any judicial branch defers to the man who claims to be offended by God’s name, but fails to consider any offense to God.  Why do we allow the individual choice of some to acknowledge their path, but hypocritically not allow the individual choice of others when God is part of their path?  Have we not seen?  Have we not heard?  How is that free?  How is that an honoring of any declaration of independence?

 

While some will reject the historical scriptures outright, the wise man would be prudent to pay attention.  The ancient scriptures always forecast the demise of the country that no longer credits the Creator.  Bad things happen to countries where men continually forsake God, instead worshipping and accrediting manmade objects and ideals, somehow believing that we are wiser than the divine.  Perhaps better said, too often we act as if we have no need for God.  We give more thought and care to God’s omission than existence. Study history.  Look at the numerous countries which quit acknowledging the God of the universe — and that now no longer exist.

 

Happy Independence Day, friends.  I am apt to believe it should be celebrated…  with pomp and parade…  guns and games… and solemn acts of devotion to God.

 

Respectfully,

AR