components of respectful dialogue

xv7k95vofa-alexis-brown

Knowing it’s a priority of the Intramuralist, recently someone asked me exactly what “respectful dialogue” means. Allow me to begin by professing that I am no expert. The thoughts shared below are a compilation of priorities I’ve embraced from the insights and wisdom of Dr. Marilee Adams, Steven M. Covey, Carol Kent, Catherine Marshall, M. Scott Peck, Marshall Rosenberg, scripture, and more. Some words are my own; some are not. But this is how I think. I believe it is only through respectful dialogue that we can consistently, continually communicate.

So let’s first identify some terms. Some are positive; some are not. Positive terms include evaluate, opine, assess, probe, and critique (or “constructively criticize”). Negative terms include judge, bash, insult, denigrate, and criticize. [A couple notes… #1: the difference between “critique” and “criticism” is the motive… #2: the meaning of “criticism/critical” has changed through the years — moving from a sense of analysis to more a place of judgment.]

In order to be sharpened by meaningful discussion, we need to communicate in respectful ways. I’ve included key components of respectful dialogue. Granted, this list is not exhaustive — but it would help us communicate incredibly better, if we could each…

1. Encourage 1st person pronoun usage. Utilize expressions based on personal experience, including phrases such as “in my opinion” or “as I understand the facts.” As Rosenberg advises, instead of saying, “The indisputable truth is,” a person offers “I believe it to be true that.” This recognizes the fact that others may have a different perception, information, or sense of truth.

2. Refrain from accusatory language. Avoid rhetorical slams such as, “you are wrong” or “he doesn’t know the facts.” Such accusations typically prompt more defensiveness than pave any progress toward respectful, productive dialogue.

3. Avoid assertions about others’ motives. This refers to conclusions such as “I will assume your silence means” or “you must say that because.” Rarely can we fully know the motivation of another — especially in social media. This also typically prompts defensiveness.

4. Offer generous affirmation and empathy — offer it even first. This helps people know that we care more about them than wanting to shout our own opinions, be right, or drown out any varied thinking.

5. Avoid vulgarity. Geesh… I can’t say this enough. This is no attempt to insert any sort of “morality police.” It’s more because it’s disrespectful and rarely makes any among the intelligent look so wise. Let me offer, however, a brief caveat, aware that many of us resort to this at some point in time. If expressed, the vulgarity should be indirect (i.e. using “holy sh*t” as opposed to “that piece of sh*t”… granted, it is a very rare occasion that such sh*t is actually “holy”).

6. Avoid mass labeling and/or stereotypes. The notion that “all liberals,” “all conservatives,” “all Pantsuit Nation members,” “all Trump supporters,” “all white people,” “all black people,” “all religious,” etc. can be identified as “all anything” is simply inaccurate. Such shows a lack of discernment on the articulator’s behalf, and thus causes the articulator to lose credibility.

7. Avoid venting. Most every conversation that begins with “I just had to say” or “I’m just going to put this out there” or “I have to get this off my chest” ignores that reality that the subject of each is self. Venting is better shared in counseling, close friendships, and accountability relationships.

8. Honor all emotions, especially deeply negative or positive passions. After the expression, it’s helpful to echo back what we heard and engage in reflective listening, utilizing such phrases as, “It sounds like you feel very [blank]” or “yes, this can be very emotional.” We are honoring the person by validating their passion — not necessarily by agreeing with the perspective.

9. Ask questions of another. I can’t say this enough. Consistent with Covey’s Habit #5 — “Seek first to understand, then to be understood” — this is undoubtedly one of the hardest things for current culture to consistently do, especially via social media. Most of us are most comfortable stating our own, full opinion first, as opposed to taking the time and effort to truly understand another. Instead of evaluating (positive term), we judge (negative term). Instead of probing (positive term), we ask questions from our own frame of reference (self focus). Each of these obstruct understanding.

And 10. Remember there is always something we don’t know. That reality keeps us humble, keeps us asking more questions, and keeps us focusing on others more than self.

Here’s to respectful dialogue… always.

Respectfully…
AR

warmer days

zryiivwcw0i-alice-donovan-rouse

It’s pretty cold in my hometown these days. At the time of this writing, my seemingly temperamental thermometer is registering a whole 11°.

Driving in the cold yesterday, I was about to turn into a small shopping center when I noticed an older van blocking the entrance. So I finagled my vehicle via the exit route instead, backed up, and positioned my car directly in front of the van. Here I noticed a middle-aged woman, obviously struggling, and I could tell that her phone was frustrating her somehow, also.

So I got out of my car in the windchill that made the temps even colder.

“Ma’am, are you ok? Do you need help?”

She opened her door, and in a bit of understandable distress, responded, “My car just died. It just died in the middle of the road! And my phone won’t work either.”

I then asked that she come with me, sit in my car — a bit of a warmth oasis from the outside chills — and use my phone instead.

“Jennifer” was her name. Warming up a bit inside and out, I quickly sensed a very kind, meek woman. So meek, in fact, when I held out my phone for her to call the emergency auto service, she began to press the buttons shyly while I still held the phone.



“It’s ok. You take it.”

Together we spoke to the road service, identifying the location, issue, etc. She needed some assistance with that.

Part of the assistance was affirming in spite of the onlookers. Here in my car sat one caucasian and one African-American. We were now both blocking the entrance, in what is a fairly busy locale. But sure enough, consistent with some of the perceived societal digression, we witnessed not so much a division in the onlookers — more a unity. All sorts of persons drove by, attempting to enter but unable; there were all sorts of ethnicities, demographics, you-name-it. And they were unified…

… in their impatience.

The audacity of the number who felt need to honk at us was a little incredulous, to say the least.

Jennifer was bothered; I was moved by her genuine desire not to be a burden to anyone. I smiled and said to her, “No worries. I’m always amazed at how impatient people can be when they don’t have all the information. They simply don’t understand. And they don’t know what they don’t take the time to understand.”

She sweetly returned my smile.

After 20 minutes or so, we felt the situation was under control, and Jennifer went back to her car with the tow truck’s imminent arrival. She thanked me multiple times, especially for stopping in the cold.

It wasn’t much. I said, “You know, I believe one of the reasons God put us here was to learn to love him by helping one another. Thanks for allowing me to help you.”

And with that, we said our sincere goodbyes.

It’s pretty cold in my hometown these days. But some days are a little warmer.

Respectfully…
AR

one year. one word.

6mmfmbjd8pe-eddy-lackmann

So with the new year and accompanying plethora of “Yada-Yada-Yada’s of the Year” proclamations, I found myself somewhat amused by Merriam-Webster’s announcement that “surreal” was its word of the year for 2016. Defined as something that has been “marked by the intense irrational reality of a dream,” the company’s “official” statement read:

“ ‘Surreal’ is Merriam-Webster’s Word of the Year because it was looked up significantly more frequently by users in 2016 than it was in previous years, and because there were multiple occasions on which this word was the one clearly driving people to their dictionary.”

Surreal’s selection was based upon volume, as the company analyzes “perennial words that are looked up day-in and day-out, and words that spike because of news events, politics, pop culture, or sports.” Close runner ups included “revenant,” “icon,” and “in omnia paratus” — a Latin term meaning “ready for all things.”

So it got me thinking…
… about the year to come…

Perhaps you’ve seen the encouragement… Pick a word. Any word. What’s your one word for the year ahead?

“Change is possible, but focus is required,” suggests MyOneWord.org, meaning that if we were to focus solely on one thing — just one thing — one word, that is — that change would be more probable and likely; it wouldn’t seem like such a daunting task. Our word could be…

… resilient… belief… patient… disciplined… grateful… peace loving… healthy… consistent… positive… brave…

It matters not if the word is an adjective, verb, or any other particular part of speech. But it should have great meaning to you. That’s it: you. It matters not what it may mean to another; it matters what it means to you.

“My One Word” authors Mike Ashcraft and Rachel Olsen contend that: “Our resolutions seldom work because they are based on the type of person we’re tired of being rather than who God wants us to become. Plus, resolutions can be ‘broken,’ leaving no room for the process of growth. What if our hopes for the year ahead centered instead on who God wants us to become, and the transformation process?

It’s okay to want to be a better you, and the New Year is a natural time to start. The question is, how? My One Word replaces broken promises with a vision for real change. When you choose a single word, you have a clarity and focus. You are moving toward the future rather than swearing off the past.”

They thus outline the following steps:

Step one: determine the kind of person you want to become. Think about December of 2017, the end of next year. Who do you want to be by then?

Step two: identify the characteristics of that person. Visualize them. What are they like? What are the specific qualities of the person you want to become?

And step three: Pick a word. “There might be fifteen things that you want to change, but you must resist the temptation to promise you will do them all. Instead, simply commit to ONE WORD.”

What I appreciate about this exercise is that it makes change and growth possible. It makes it practical; it makes it noticeable. It doesn’t take a divine lightning bolt from the sky, nor is it merely some rhetorically-pleasing resolution that we’ll be defeatedly chucking in a matter of months. This is real growth… real change. If we are going to become the people God has called each of us individually to be, then we need to grow and change… each year. That process is nothing short of, well, surreal.

Join me, friends. Pick a word. Any word. Just one.

Respectfully…
AR

who they are

c0exwnqhvso-jakob-owens

She was the first princess I ever truly desired to imitate.
His transcendence beyond boxing amazed me.
Her Pulitzer Prize winning masterpiece was the first novel I ever loved.
His brilliance on the High Court was striking, as noted by one of his besties, the ideologically opposite Ginsberg.
She was simply the best at what she did — that is, before Geno’s Huskies.
And then there were those three who made me sing — from “Freedom” to “Desperado” — to even luring me repeatedly to the dance floor with “Little Red Corvette” and more.

Carrie Fisher…
Muhammad Ali…
Harper Lee…
Antonin Scalia…
Pat Summitt…
And George Michael, Glen Frey, and the ever talented, musical mastermind, Prince.

Each passed away in 2016.

They weren’t alone… David Bowie… Fidel Castro… Leonard Cohen… Patty Duke… Zsa Zsa Gabor… John Glenn… Merle Haggard… Henry Heimlich… Florence Henderson… Gordie Howe… Gwen Ifill… Arnold Palmer… Shimon Peres… Nancy Reagan… Janet Reno… Morley Safer… Craig Sager… Phyllis Schlafly… Alan Thicke… Abe Vigoda… Elie Wiesel… Gene Wilder…

… and more.

It makes me ponder two questions…

One… what will we say about them?

… that they performed well? … that they had a great hit? … that they led or acted or won or lost or ruled or governed or did something really outstanding, notable, awful, or good?

In other words, will we speak of what they did? … or… about who they are?

Which leads, therefore, to my second question…

What will we want them one day to say about us?

Will we want people to talk about what we did?

… or…

Will we want them to note our character? … who we are?

Let’s honor Fisher and Frey and Haggard and Heimlich, etal. by talking less about what they did… and more about who they are.

Respectfully…
AR

the conclusion of our diverse roundtable

5yoefhjeagw-kent-henderson

[What a treat to spend extended time with these 6 individuals. What a growth opportunity to be sharpened by those who don’t all think the same as me. Here is the end of our 5 part series, as articulated by Brent, Janie, Mike, Roni, Ronnie, and Ruth, and their recognition of intentional respect as the first, best step forward…]
_____

AR: Ok, friends — and that’s what you are… I so appreciate how each of you recognizes that friendship and relationship are more important than agreement and likemindedness. Give me some final thoughts as we wrap this up (although I have a sneaky suspicion we may keep talking…).

BRENT: Nobody reads BOOKS anymore! I see so many people my age (31) and younger completely detached from the mechanics of real learning or study. I read a note today that summed it up well, saying, “We educate to the point of accepting what we’ve been taught, but not enough to question it.”

RONI: This group is a group of readers. The number of bookstores that have gone out of business is incredible. Very sad. Many read on-line, but sadly many done. I think you make a good point.

MIKE: In the spirit of what Ann is promoting here, I’ll put myself out there. Why is it assumed because I am conservative that I am evil, greedy, prejudiced, and/or don’t care about people in need? Because I assure you, none are true.

RONI: Likewise, as being termed liberal, why am I seen as wasteful, soft on crime, not a real Christian, and unpatriotic?

AR: Why are people so judgmental of political identifications?

MIKE: Equally fair questions, Roni, though I do not equate politics with crime, religion, or patriotism.

RUTH: I’m with Mike, in that I despise the way people have treated others, as in the stories shared here of assumptions and hateful treatment toward others. The only way I know to conceptualize why there’s so much judgment is because we’re in a fallen world, awaiting us unifying, while an enemy stirs up division and strife. If one has received mercy from the Creator, even in disagreement, empathy is possible toward “opposing sides.”

RONI: Empathy or a lack there of plays a significant role. Seeing if someone who seems so different from you has the same value but through a different lens is critical.

MIKE: This has been great conversation. This is the way our political discourse should be. And Congress. It could be, if we could focus on everyone winning rather than our side winning. We all lose when we won’t let the other side win.
_____

Our conversation actually covered far more, fascinating ground. We went on to respectfully discuss the following, although arguably each to a limited extent:

  • Why a person is conservative
  • Why a person is liberal
  • Why it is inaccurate to identify conservatives as “angry, white males”
  • Why it is inaccurate to label either party/partisans as either “meaner” or “kinder” than another
  • “Hateful attitudes” on both sides
  • The sadness and potential hate in “unfriending”
  • Voting for the person as opposed to party
  • Russian involvement/WikiLeaks
  • The burden of our $19 trillion debt
  • States rights
  • The role of the federal government — how big should it be?
  • Economic analysis of the Carrier deal
  • North Carolina
  • The value/concerns of privatization — including education
  • Perceived economic differences
  • Populist candidates
  • Potential cabinet nominations and appointees
  • Racism, socialism, elitism, etc.
  • The wide, bipartisan respect for Colin Powell
  • The power that accompanies wealth
  • The Electoral College
  • William F. Buckley
  • If the current Dem. and Rep. parties are consistent with their predecessors
  • Putting down our labels
  • How “everybody is right and everybody is wrong”
  • How true conservatives and true liberals are alike and often agree on concepts
  • Where we each get our news
  • The Chicago Cubs and more.

There was generous affirmation, questions, and respect, finding more we had in common than did not. We get into trouble when we magnify the “did not’s.” So allow me to close with a couple more comments from the table…

MIKE: Sounds like lots of agreement here. If we could unite in purpose, I think we could figure out how to get there.

RONI: I think this group could find enough agreement to make things work fairly for all.

RUTH: I appreciate the hope and value each of you all have brought to the table. I am thankful for the ability, as upside down as the world is, to still reach across and shake hands, and show care, concern, and hope.

Agreed… and amen.

Respectfully…
AR

a diverse roundtable – part 4 of 5

q2hmrd-aook-victor-mirontschuk

[Over the past week, we’ve posted excerpts from a conversation with 6 diverse individuals: Brent, Janie, Mike, Roni, Ronnie, and Ruth. Each recognizes intentional respect as the first, best step forward in the polarized, political environment in which we live. Here is the second to last piece of our conversation, with the conclusion coming Tuesday…]
_____

AR: We’ve referenced a need to “overcome” — overcoming a nastiness on all sides… from the ugliness, hatred, arrogance… even from sides thinking they are “all in the right” and another is “all in the wrong.” How do we actually overcome? How do we “overcome someday”?

MIKE: I used to think the goal was a color-blind society. I no longer believe that. Racism exists, so we need to deal with it. I ask my black friends what it’s like, how they get looked at, and how I can help. I think it starts there — we all need diverse friends. We can’t understand what it’s like to be black, Hispanic, gay, liberal, or conservative until we sincerely get to know people who are.

RUTH: We need to recognize we are in this together. We need more intentional communication across lines of diversity, yes — and pursuing opportunity to grow in understanding, wisdom, and synergy.

JANIE: With my diverse friends, there is no subject we won’t talk about. We talk about what we don’t understand. I keep coming back to Ecclesiastes 3, said in Hebrew and English after the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007…. “a time to be born, a time to die, a time to plant, a time to pluck up that which is planted, a time to heal, a time to build up, a time to weep, a time to laugh, a time to dance, a time to embrace, a time to lose, a time to keep, a time to keep silence, a time to speak, a time to love, a time of peace… So perhaps wisdom comes with those words. Learning to listen… to walk in another’s shoes…

AR: So how do people fuel the division, even though they may not realize it? And is there ever a time to severe a relationship over political differences?

MIKE: Our language fuels division. Why is white always good, and black bad? White hat, dark side, blackball, etc. Calling myself pro-life implies you are against life. Calling yourself progressive implies I am against progress.
I never sever relationships. But I have blocked people on Facebook so I don’t have to listen to their incessant rants.

JANIE: I don’t severe relationships over political differences.

RUTH: I can’t see severing a relationship over political differences. As a respected leader in my life often says, “We don’t often get 100% agreement over things in our own household!” Life is full of negotiating differences in relationships. Political differences may go deep, but I hope relationships go deeper.
We all have reasons behind our political leanings, which always have the possibility to change. If we cut each other off rather than try to understand and graciously express reasons for our position — or at least discuss how to work together for the common good — doesn’t that in itself inadvertently perpetuate division?

Seems to me, if we are not intentional, we can fuel division by default. Unless we make efforts to stay open to listening — and if we don’t look for opportunities to reach across barriers to connect, then our circles of association will continue to drift further apart. If not intentional to search past our comfort zone of associates most like us, then social media feeds us our separate preferences, ingraining them further.

Also fueling division: presenting our opinions as judgments and labels against others — and in a manner lacking humility, mercy, and love even, for persons with opposing views.

RONI: So what can be done?
1. Recognize there are issues.
2. Create safe spaces, like this, for respectful discussion of solutions; solutions often take a long time.
3. Recognize that as you discuss there needs to be follow-up, because healing takes time.
4. Seek to understand the meaning and intent of others.
5. Respond with kindness when possible.
6. Understand that protests are not bad but part of the change process.
7. Value the first amendment while understanding your words/actions have consequences.

AR: How still is social media making this worse?

JANIE: Facebook tries to tell me I don’t know what I am talking about, even when I live here, witnessing reality. It incites the ugly and mean.

MIKE: So many ways, social media makes this worse. Fake news, anonymous trolling, etc. And with so many news sources, outlets seek out the extreme to get attention. But the biggest issue is being able to filter out news sources to see only what we want to see. We are continually reinforcing our own viewpoint without seeking to understand others.

RONI: Mike, I think you are right. We do give more grace to those we understand. We all tend to discount others. Part of that is the Western practice of only seeing things as right/wrong or good/evil.
_____

Recognizing that one “side” is not all good or all evil — encouraging each of us to seek to understand others first.

Great discussion. Our conclusion comes Tuesday…

Respectfully…
AR

(not) something lesser

eikbsc3sdti-sonja-langford

Ok, I’ll admit it. I’m guilty. Totally guilty.

Sometimes I make this entire holiday season into something it was never intended to be. Sometimes I make it about materialism. Sometimes I make it about gifts. Sometimes I make it about something lesser.

Sometimes I pout. Sometimes I get something so stuck in my craw that I can’t emotionally shake myself out of it. I can’t always surrender to the Divine in order to help me navigate wisely through it. So yes, sometimes I focus on something lesser — not realizing that it actually is lesser.

A local church community created the below in video form last week. I thought it was brilliant — and relevant to each of us in different ways. It’s a message for Advent, a time of expectant waiting and preparation for future celebration. But sometimes we’re so busy that we miss the depth of the celebration. We miss what’s most important…

Everyone wants Christmas
To be meaningful
But, instead it becomes
Shop, shop, shop,
Credit cards
Traffic jams
To do lists
Useless gifts
Then off to church
Noel, Noel, Noel
Sometimes we’re just glad to survive it.
Did you know Americans spend $450 billion on Christmas every year?
EVERY YEAR.
So we ask?
How did Jesus celebrate?
Jesus gave
He gave himself
Relationally.
Incarnation.
Time, space, presence… (do you see where this is going?)
WHAT IF
you bought FEWER GIFTS
[that sweater she won’t like]
[that random gift certificate]
[that toy he doesn’t need]
And then instead of BUYING that gift
Give something valuable
LIKE
YOUR
TIME
Talk, eat, sled, bake, bike, read, play, create, craft
TOGETHER
Make gifts (like when you were a kid)
And remember that money you didn’t spend
What if you gave some of it away?
To the poor, the hurting, the lonely, the hungry, the sick, the thirsty
Since 2006 thousands of churches have been giving all over the world
That’s a lot of love… life
All because people
Spent LESS on gifts
And MORE ON relationships
LET’S FACE IT
Consumerism does not equal happiness, memories, meaning
Spend less on gifts
Give more on presence…

If we gave more on presence, I wonder what would happen… would our relationships be better? … would we be more empathetic? … would we be less accepting of division and writing people off? … would we learn to see more sides than our own?

I’m thinking I need to do this far more than this time of year.

Respectfully…
AR

the bubble of lalaland

photo-1463109598173-3864231fade5

Recently I experienced a tough conflict with a few friends. “Tough” means the conflict was deep, the passions were strong, and the people are important to me; we didn’t all feel the same way, and navigating through the conflict is difficult. Shortly after the conflict commenced, I got on a plane and flew to LaLaLand… ok, Orlando… Disney… No offense to all my Florida friends… it was a wonderful weekend away.

It was wonderful for many reasons — foremost being the ability to escape the prevailing, oh-so-beautiful “overcastness” of a November in the Midwest — where the first, coldest breezes signaling autumn’s end do far more than send a chill up one’s spine. I was able to exchange such loveliness for warm temps, sunshine, and a pretty spiffy, spanking new convertible.

It was a leisure trip — minimal work — a few professional meetings, but mostly just relaxing and basking in the sunshine.

Yet another reason for the trip being wonderful was that it provided for me a bit of a bubble… a cleared out, insulating space where I didn’t have to deal with anything but the warm temps, sunshine, and spiffy convertible.

I didn’t have to deal with the conflict.

In fact, not only did I not have to deal with it, but the beauty of the bubble is that it allowed me to escape reality for a while. I could go and frolic and bask in the Sunshine State’s sunshine… and thus escape and ignore what remained back underneath the overcast.

The bubble effectively insulated me from reality.

But a funny thing happens when you fly to the land of Minnie and Mickey for a weekend. You have to fly back.

Flying back means wrestling with reality.

The reality is that the conflict does exist and because the people are important to me, I’m going to have to work it out. I’m going to have to deal with some messy stuff. I’m going to have to humble myself long enough to admit my own wrongful thinking, and navigate through some challenging perspectives. I’m going to have to be still. I’m going to have to listen and learn from more than the likeminded. I’m going to have to respectfully articulate my opinion. I’m going to have to quit convincing myself that I have the sole valid take on the issue. And I’m going to have wrestle with the legitimacy of a side other than mine, even when that’s incredibly difficult for me to see.

Let’s be clear; it’s not that I need to simply lay down, submit, and surrender my opinion; it’s not that I have to dismiss the validity of my experience. No, my opinion is valid. Each of our opinions are valid. It’s more that we must each listen to each other. I must listen. They must listen. I must refrain from judgment. They must refrain from judgment.

Why? Because listening to others and refraining from judgment are keys to wisdom.

I will be very honest. I don’t always have a desire to listen. Sometimes it’s easier for me to just hang out in my bubble, insulated by the exterior, and not navigate through any tough conflicts. Sometimes it’s easier to go to Disneyland.

But I believe in loving all people well. I believe in respect for all people — not just the ones who see the world as I do. I believe in seeing life through the eyes of people who are different than me… even when it’s hard. They sharpen me. They help me grow.

Please, though… don’t think more highly of me than you ought. I make more than my fair share of mistakes and obvious errors in judgment. This isn’t easy. I just want what’s better, wiser, and more.

Also… it’s really hard to quit thinking about that convertible.

Respectfully… always…
AR

speaking someone else’s language

photo-1464998857633-50e59fbf2fe6-1

One of the things I don’t believe we’re all that good at doing is speaking the language of another. I’m not quite sure what it is, what the reason is. Is it pride? Is it arrogance? … unwillingness? I don’t know. But for some reason it seems like a significant part of the population feels no need to speak the language of someone else.

I wonder for a moment, if many feel it’s simply unnecessary…. “There here on my turf; they can learn to talk like the rest of us.” I get it. They came here. There are consequences that accompany that choice.

But please don’t mistake my point to be about the official foreign languages of the world. I’m not talking about German, Spanish, etc. I mean, if I choose to go to France, I need to learn to speak French. I can’t expect the rest of the world to accommodate me. In fact, I have some great American friends living/working in China, Russia, and Papua New Guinea. I admire that each is thoroughly invested in learning the culture and language of which they are immersed in. They know that if they are going to communicate with the people around them — really communicate — with the people around them — their audience — then they need to learn to speak the language of their audience. Knowing the language of your audience demonstrates empathy, showing deep respect for someone other than self.

I admit: this isn’t easy to learn. It means I put communicating with another person over the right to rant and rave in my own language. We so like to rant and rave.

But what if the ranting and raving only pushes people away? What good is it? Is it simply an exercise in emotional venting or vomit? (Sorry, but “vomit” was really fun to write right there…)

I want something more. Sorry. But yes, I want something more. I want to really connect with other people. I want authentic fellowship. I want to learn from the UN-likeminded. I want to encourage. I want to be mutually sharpened. And I want to find solution to some of these nagging, ongoing problems, rather than demand everyone think like me. The first step in doing that is connecting with other people. The first step in connecting with other people is learning to speak their language.

Is their tone more gentle?
Is it more conservative?
Is it more liberal?
Is it more respectful of faith?
Is it more vulgar?

And am I willing to sit and speak their language? Or do I just get too hung up in the language itself?

Years ago I had opportunity to spend some time at a summer camp for teens and young adults with special needs. It was a beautiful, unusual, eye-opening weekend. As a person who would became the parent of a special needs child, I would later reflect upon this time as invaluable.

It is very important when learning to effectively interact with persons with special needs to communicate authentically. If we are going to make a difference… if we are going to connect… If we are going to communicate in such a way that spurs both of us on… then we need to communicate clearly. But let’s face it: we need to speak their language, ceding all thoughts and judgments of our own.

Their was one young man who especially caught my eye that weekend. He was active. He worked. He liked to be with people. He would even dance. While his facial expressions never changed from anything other than seemingly somber, I loved communicating with him. Communicating with him meant spurring him on to tasks and accomplishments he (and others) once deemed impossible.

But this young man spoke a language far different than me. In fact, he actually spoke very little. When he did say something, it was a single word. That word was only expressed in moments of intense emotion; it could be grief, frustration, or even joy. I loved it when he said it — because it meant he was being transparent, trusting us with how he felt, letting us know his emotions were deep. But the only way authentic communication was possible was if I surrendered my right, my thinking, and my judgment, that he should talk and think exactly like me. Remember: it was a single word…

“Shiittt”, he would calmly utter. Almost dead panned. It was his only word… from cutting his knee to cutting it up on the dance floor. It was the only word I ever heard him say. Yet how thankful I was, that this young man was willing to communicate with me. A privilege, without a doubt.

May we always be willing to speak and understand the language of another more than self.

Respectfully…
AR

redemption

photo-1468934047141-60c4fecdcc00

First, from Dictionary.com:

redemption

[ri-demp-shuh n]

noun
1. an act of redeeming or atoning for a fault or mistake, or the state of being redeemed.
2. deliverance; rescue.
3. Theology. deliverance from sin; salvation.
4. atonement for guilt.

Then from other, more blog-oriented, subjective sites:

… “the act of delivering from sin or saving from evil.”

… “the act of buying something back, or paying a price to return something to your possession.”

… “It means bought back, redeemed.”

Best I can tell, colloquially speaking, it means a person screws up — meaning a significant, seemingly character-defining, severely negative mistake — and then over some course of time, they change. The change is marked not only by the grieving of their own error/sin/offense, but they also make amends (as able), ask forgiveness, and they commit, as best as possible, to “sin no more.”

My sense is the scenario that allows for redemption is an incredibly ugly thing. My sense is that it also has the potential to be incredibly, amazingly powerful.

Here, though, is the problem…

While personally when we screw up (because yes, we all do), we believe in redemption — we know we’re capable of better and we want to grow and become wiser — we withhold that from other people, especially public personalities.

It’s like we say “I saw them when they said ______… I watched them when they did ______…” And then we forever put them in that box, so-to-speak. We forever act as if we know who they really are… and we don’t give them the grace and space to grow and change… even though we reserve that grace and space for ourselves.

Chuck Colson is the first person I think of… a man who was known to be politically ruthless, termed by one Slate Magazine writer as “the evil genius” of the Nixon administration. When he later repented and even founded Prison Fellowship in 1976, “the nation’s largest outreach to prisoners, ex-prisoners, and their families” today, I wonder how many held onto their own, previously held position, the “in-my-box” idea that Colson was still that ruthless man, because “I saw them when…”

I think, too, of Pietro Maso, the Italian man — 46 now — who bludgeoned his parents to death with heavy kitchen pans and then suffocated them, all to receive his inheritance when he was 20. For such a crime, I’m certain many would aver “no way is that guy ever changing!” … except in prison, he repented. In fact, Pope Francis called him after he was released, acknowledging his changed heart. Maso has now dedicated himself to helping others.

It makes me wonder… who else are we putting in a box?

Who else are we withholding the right to grow and change?

Who else do we believe is incapable of redemption?

(Scary thought. We can be a little judgmental sometimes…)

Respectfully…
AR