the validity of the virtue

pbgwsmxxq4k-kristopher-roller

What would I most like to see?

What would I most like to see in all people… from all people… given to all people…

In all things… in sports, politics, relationships, families, you-name-it…

Instead of division… instead of the strife… instead of any arrogance, self-righteousness, or denigration… I wish for the following in all:

  • Love
  • Joy
  • Peace
  • Patience
  • Kindness
  • Goodness
  • Faithfulness
  • Gentleness
  • And self-control

That’s it. Easy. Well sort of.

Ponder what would be different if we never sacrificed any of the above… if we never deemed one of the above unnecessary… or if we never justified the omission of one.

I wish I would have never said, thought, or justified…

I’m so mad, I don’t need to love my neighbor well…
I’m so ticked off, I don’t need to be patient with another side…
I’m so right, I don’t need to be gentle, not to mention any thought of being kind…

I’m so something… something that dismisses the validity of the virtue.

And then we dismiss the need for goodness, faithfulness, self-control, etc.

Friends, against such things, there is no law; there are no restrictions. All of the above are always good. There is never a time synonymous with wisdom that omits any of the above.

Allow me to be more clear. I’m not always all that good at all of the above. Sometimes I’m not faithful, not gentle, and I have zero desire for kindness or self-control.

But my desire does not change what it good and true and right. What’s right remains right, whether I desire it or not. In fact, if my desire contradicts what is valid and virtuous, what is valid and virtuous is not what’s in need of change.

I offer great grace to those who struggle with one or more of the above. Allow me to humbly include myself in said mix, as I’m not sure any of us ever master the complete list this side of the human experience.

However, an inability to master does not preclude the need to work on it.
An inability to do it well consistently does not negate the need for growth.
And an inability to even desire such virtues never dismisses their validity.

Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control…

That’s it. Easy.

Well sort of.

Respectfully…
AR

a wild time for listening

photo-1473109159134-31e419621809-1

Ponder that thought for a moment…

Of all that’s been said and written in the last two weeks… hashed and rehashed… ranted and raved… and the whole range of expressed and unexpressed emotion in our country — surprise, shock, glee, despair, fear, freedom, and so much more…

For all that’s been written, all that’s been said, this is a wild time for listening.

Few disciplines have greater value. Few behaviors teach us more. I speak not of just being silent, contemplating a reply — but rather being still… being intent on interacting, hearing, considering, and genuinely weighing the words and heart of another… being teachable… being willing and humble enough to recognize where we are off and where we could grow. Listening is an unquestionable virtue.

As author and activist Bryant H. McGill said, “One of the most sincere forms of respect is actually listening to what another has to say.”

Exactly. Listening and respect always go together.

And yet over the past two weeks, people have justified omitting both.

People have justified concluding that listening and respect are no longer necessary if we disagree.

“… My passions are strong. My perspective is valid.”

I get it. And I applaud it. Each perspective is valid. And the diversity of our collective perspectives spurs us on as individuals and as a nation. But a valid perspective is lessened when listening is eliminated in the process.

The Intramuralist will never applaud dismissing the words and heart of a person simply because another comes from a varied theological, social, or ethnic background. The moment we justify such is the moment we stunt our very own growth… and the moment we have become the intolerant.

Tolerance does not equate to accepting all things as equally good, true, and right. But tolerance does mean being willing to co-exist with those who think differently than “me.” It means sincerely being willing to interact with persons of varied theological, social, and ethnic backgrounds. If I am only willing to respectfully dialogue with persons who think like me — regardless of what demographic categories another falls into — than I am by no means tolerant. Tolerance — and listening — mean that neither what a person looks like or how they think is a barrier to respectful dialogue.

And yet each of us, all around us at this time, have people tugging on our sleeves and ears, suggesting (not always so subtly) that another person is not worth it.

That is disturbing.

When we advocate for something less than listening, we dismiss the worth of another person. When we dismiss the worth of other persons in God’s creation, we get puffed up. And when we get puffed up, we are the ones who fail to learn and grow.

It’s been a wild time for listening these last two weeks. In too many places, it doesn’t exist.

May we always advocate for what’s better and more.

Respectfully…
AR

the bubble of lalaland

photo-1463109598173-3864231fade5

Recently I experienced a tough conflict with a few friends. “Tough” means the conflict was deep, the passions were strong, and the people are important to me; we didn’t all feel the same way, and navigating through the conflict is difficult. Shortly after the conflict commenced, I got on a plane and flew to LaLaLand… ok, Orlando… Disney… No offense to all my Florida friends… it was a wonderful weekend away.

It was wonderful for many reasons — foremost being the ability to escape the prevailing, oh-so-beautiful “overcastness” of a November in the Midwest — where the first, coldest breezes signaling autumn’s end do far more than send a chill up one’s spine. I was able to exchange such loveliness for warm temps, sunshine, and a pretty spiffy, spanking new convertible.

It was a leisure trip — minimal work — a few professional meetings, but mostly just relaxing and basking in the sunshine.

Yet another reason for the trip being wonderful was that it provided for me a bit of a bubble… a cleared out, insulating space where I didn’t have to deal with anything but the warm temps, sunshine, and spiffy convertible.

I didn’t have to deal with the conflict.

In fact, not only did I not have to deal with it, but the beauty of the bubble is that it allowed me to escape reality for a while. I could go and frolic and bask in the Sunshine State’s sunshine… and thus escape and ignore what remained back underneath the overcast.

The bubble effectively insulated me from reality.

But a funny thing happens when you fly to the land of Minnie and Mickey for a weekend. You have to fly back.

Flying back means wrestling with reality.

The reality is that the conflict does exist and because the people are important to me, I’m going to have to work it out. I’m going to have to deal with some messy stuff. I’m going to have to humble myself long enough to admit my own wrongful thinking, and navigate through some challenging perspectives. I’m going to have to be still. I’m going to have to listen and learn from more than the likeminded. I’m going to have to respectfully articulate my opinion. I’m going to have to quit convincing myself that I have the sole valid take on the issue. And I’m going to have wrestle with the legitimacy of a side other than mine, even when that’s incredibly difficult for me to see.

Let’s be clear; it’s not that I need to simply lay down, submit, and surrender my opinion; it’s not that I have to dismiss the validity of my experience. No, my opinion is valid. Each of our opinions are valid. It’s more that we must each listen to each other. I must listen. They must listen. I must refrain from judgment. They must refrain from judgment.

Why? Because listening to others and refraining from judgment are keys to wisdom.

I will be very honest. I don’t always have a desire to listen. Sometimes it’s easier for me to just hang out in my bubble, insulated by the exterior, and not navigate through any tough conflicts. Sometimes it’s easier to go to Disneyland.

But I believe in loving all people well. I believe in respect for all people — not just the ones who see the world as I do. I believe in seeing life through the eyes of people who are different than me… even when it’s hard. They sharpen me. They help me grow.

Please, though… don’t think more highly of me than you ought. I make more than my fair share of mistakes and obvious errors in judgment. This isn’t easy. I just want what’s better, wiser, and more.

Also… it’s really hard to quit thinking about that convertible.

Respectfully… always…
AR

the election and the unthinkable

photo-1451471016731-e963a8588be8

In case it isn’t clear, the Intramuralist is not a conflict avoider. It’s not that I love it, desire it, nor welcome conflict with open arms. It simply doesn’t scare me away. And I have realized that navigating through conflict wisely is undoubtedly one of the most effective means of growth.

Let me be clear: I am not speaking of growth for others; I am speaking of growth for me.

When not recognizing the growth opportunity, conflict has the potential to bring out the worst in us. In the last week, we have felt and witnessed “the worst”… name calling, gloating, violence, judgment, and disrespect… on all sides.

Friends, you can’t love your neighbor well if you only love half your neighbors.

Last week we had an election. It was tough; it still is. Many are struggling with the vote, even though no candidate tallied a majority; no one received 50%. That means whomever each of us voted for, we are each in the minority. But being in the minority is hard; it’s hard to process all that happened. There is grief. There is fear. There is celebration by some. But there is still grief and fear. We must be cognizant of all.

Allow me, if you will, to humbly share the events of my day last week… Tuesday, November 8th, Election Day…

As typical, I chose not to vote via absentee ballot. I enjoy physically going to the polls, catching up with my neighbors, interacting with those in my community. First, I ran into some old friends from baseball. Our sons played together when they were six (… that was 13 years ago!). I then saw another show choir mom, a man I coached with, a teacher friend, a couple couples from church, and another close family set of friends.

Then I saw Richard. Oh, wait… Three years ago, when I actually ran for a local precinct position — and lost, by the way — Richard was my opponent. We hugged, gleefully caught up, exchanged a few ideas, and wished each other well. I love Election Day.

You’ll remember, however, that going into last Tuesday, I had serious reservations about both primary party candidates. With no intended disrespect, I saw neither as all good or all evil. I saw neither as the Messiah nor as God’s gift for us all to somehow put our hope in. I saw each as a significantly, ethically flawed candidate, whose flaws were minimized by sincere supporters and carefully crafted PR campaigns.

I think perhaps what concerned me most leading up to that day, is that I also witnessed people screaming at only the flaws in the other — forgetting that both — no, strike that — forgetting that each of us, have ample dents in our armor… each of us have screwy sides… each of us are sinners with the opportunity to be saved by grace. I was grieved by the masses who only acknowledged flaws in persons other than self or in the likeminded. I foresaw conflict only increasing.

Friends, the way to navigate through conflict wisely, is to at some point pause long enough to quit pointing the finger at everyone else. It’s ok to observe. It’s ok to be hurt, frustrated, even angry. I believe it’s totally all right to utter “what in the *$&%^# [bleep] are they thinking?!” But at some point, in order to navigate through things wisely, we must stop and ask, “What here, do I need to learn?”

Exchanging the exclamation ofyou need to learn” for the humble question of “what do I need to learn” is one of the most effective means of growth.

Back, no less, to Election Day, as I then did the unthinkable…

Even though the Intramuralist pays more than ample attention to current events in hopes of always encouraging respectful dialogue, I went to bed early Tuesday night. That’s right; I paid no attention. I left my laptop off and never turned on the TV. I watched zero tweets and results as they were coming in. I said my prayers — thanking the good Lord for this gift of life, praying for mercy and grace for all of us — and then slept very well.

My concern was copious both after and before the outcome, knowing that as a nation, we do not deal with conflict well. We fail to grow because we take turns justifying the name calling, gloating, violence, judgment, and disrespect. We get sucked into those PR campaigns. We ignore the flaws in one and promote the flaws in another. We have biased news sources. We are insulated by the likeminded. We don’t embrace true accountability. We get puffed up. We only see one side of an argument. We stop talking to the ideologically diverse. We unfriend. We judge. We limit grace. We then put hope into something other than the divine. All sides. We all do it.

I get it… it’s easier. Humbly asking what we must individually learn is harder indeed…

It is also the key to loving our neighbor well.

Respectfully… always…
AR

what now?

photo-1460060343905-8bd4f8435dd6

Navigating through the aftermath. Remembering that division has existed long before now. Wading through the wise words of others…

“Everybody is sad when their side loses an election. But the day after, we have to remember we’re actually all on one team.” — B.Obama

“I believe that we can all come together because if you take away the labels, you realize we are far more alike than we are different.” — E.DeGeneres

“We all need to give President-Elect Trump a chance. Support the good. Lobby against what we disagree on. No one is bigger than us all.” — M.Cuban

“The genius of the American system is checks and balances. When one side pushes too far there will be a correction.” — D.Bacon

“As you know, I didn’t vote for Hillary or Trump. But I meant it when I said I’d congratulate the winner & give him/her a chance to unify.” — J.Bila

“President-Elect Trump promised to rebuild our economy for working people, and I offer to put aside our differences and work with him on that task.” — E.Warren

“I have never supported Donald Trump but as a young person that was given the privilege to be born into this great nation, I will have to put my opinions and what I wanted aside till future elections. The only way our country can be successful is if our leader is successful. I encourage you to have an open mind for Donald Trump, and I ask him to have an open mind for the change we want to see.” — GL, a young teen

“We will be trying to figure out for months, if not years, to come just what was this election was really all about and what’s going on with the American public.” — M.Nutter

“Civility is a two-way street. Respect can’t be demanded and then not returned. Many on both sides have been guilty of this. Let’s change political discourse from the ground up. Have the courage to ask for and listen with the intent to understand different opinions.” — B.Brown

“Go out and actually do something positive, loving, and productive for whatever cause you claimed was such a huge issue this election season!” — K

“Condemn no man for not thinking as you think.” — J.Wesley

“You can’t win people over to your side by demonizing them. If people cannot rise to the level of human decency when dealing with others, we can never expect to move forward. This goes for both leaders and constituents.” — K.McCracken

“We are now all rooting for his success.” — B.Obama

Respectfully…
AR (… and all those above)

the election, empathy, and the table

photo-1445333952594-1833970b4b35

My heart grieves. It grieves for a nation divided. We see persons who are hurting. We see persons who are fearful. We also see persons who are proud. And we see arguably the majority somewhere in between. Among both the fearful and the proud, we see persons sincerely unable to see any other perspective than their own. That is cause for grief. That has been cause for grief for me not just this week… but for years. We have been divided for some time.

Can we — and I know this is tough — but can we step outside our circumstances and emotion long enough to realize their are other valid perspectives than our own? Remember, as previously written, there are 360 degrees in a circle — each looking at the center from a different angle. That angle — through which we view life — is only one degree.

Hence, now is the time not to re-arm and get ready to fight. Now is not the time to disrespect. Now is not the time to burn the flag nor to dismiss the one who burns it. Now is the time to come to the table.

As known, one of my favorite phrases in life is “come to the table.” What I mean by that is there is a seat for everyone. No one is omitted. No one is marginalized.

That means we gather together…

That means we authentically fellowship and converse…

That means we hang out with more than the likeminded…

And that means no one drowns out another. We sit. We listen. And all voices are equally heard.

Friends, we have lost our ability to listen. When we get wind of a person who thinks differently, it seems as if we categorize them in our head as “one of them.” And “one of them” is a person we silently (or not) assess as either ignorant, intolerant, or somehow idiotic. Let me suggest that we are each ignorant in areas, as ignorant merely means “unknowing” — and there are a lot of things each of us does not know… especially when we are only “one degree” — and we refuse to come to the table.

Coming to the table means working out the tough issues…

Take the abortion issue, for example. And yes, I utilize such because it’s become so emotionally-charged. I really hate the fact that our abortion dialogue seems to have been reduced to protests and placards where people scream at or past one another, never sitting down, listening, and empathizing with the one who feels differently. We are awful here at looking at the totality of another’s perspective.

What coming to the table then does is that it allows us to hear that perspective; in other words, it provides a place for empathy. People who won’t come to the table have very limited empathy. And when there is no empathy, there is judgment. Judgment divides our nation.

So left, right, and all those somewhere in the middle…

Trump voters, Clinton voters, those third partiers or no voters…

All ethnicities, races, genders, and varied demographics…

The LGBTQ community…

The evangelical Christian community…

The faithful and the non-faithful…

The abortion advocates and the advocates for the unborn…

Americans…

Now is the time to come to the table and listen to one another… all sides… all 360 degrees… choosing empathy over judgment.

Respectfully…
AR

come…

photo-1478624728066-4eb3f085003a

I have only one phrase for this day, and no, it’s not: “Thank God it’s over.” 🙂

After campaigns that were too often filled with intentional disrespect, we need far more than a respite from the nasty. The nasty is not who we are…

We are the United States of America…

A country that has always recognized we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights…
A country that has always welcomed the huddled masses yearning to be free…
And a country that has always desired to secure the Blessings of Liberty for ourselves and future generations.

Friends, come… let us reason together…

Let us reason together.

Let us not gloat.
Let us not despair.
Let us not dismiss…
Nor refuse for all to care.

We have some huge challenges in this country.

We get lost, as they are not as much about foreign policy, education, energy, the economy, and a plethora of social issues than they are in our inability — and our lack of desire — to come and reason together.

Reasoning together means wrestling with dissent.
Reasoning together means expressing dissent in respectful ways.
And reasoning together means everyone has a seat at the table.

Reasoning together suggests consideration more than compromise. It means listening and valuing other opinion. That process promotes respect; and respect promotes unity. Our challenge is that in recent years too many of our leaders — and too many of us — have allowed our country to operate as only the “States of America.” We have forgotten the united.

To be united is like a mighty mixed choir… there are sopranos and altos and tenors and basses. There are even second sopranos… baritones, too. And together they sing. They make beautiful music! But each has a different role — a role that is uniquely theirs, fitting with their circumstance and gifting; in fact, it would be incomprehensible to think a bass could sing the soprano line well; the role doesn’t belong to them. The idea is to do your job well — and not make light of any other.

In order for the choir to come together in perfect, sweet-sounding harmony — in unity, if you will — no voice can be too soft, or else we’ll never hear it; the chorus will be off, and the music simply won’t sound or even function right. Equally true, no less, is that no voice can be too loud, belting so demonstratively, that other parts are marginalized. No, in unity, there is no marginalization.

The only way the choir sounds beautiful is when all voices are valued and heard.

Come. Let us reason together.

Respectfully…
AR

election day… eight years later…

photo-1464660756002-dd9f9a92b01b

Eight years ago today was the birth of the Intramuralist. I was so discouraged by the way people interacted with one another — by the way good, intelligent people seemed to forsake all wisdom, and forget to treat their brothers and sisters with the respect we each deserve.

That day, we began. This is what I wrote:

TOP 10 THINGS I LEARNED FROM THIS ELECTION CYCLE:

10. People will do anything to win.

9. Tina Fey is a comedic genius.

8. Limericks using “Obama” can be fun (“Homearama”… yo momma…).

7. Jesus would not be a Democrat OR a Republican.

6. Objectivity in the media cannot be assumed.

5. No party has a true grasp of all that encompasses social justice.

4. “Feminism” does not mean “in support of all women.”

3. People need to pray for our nation more than once every 4 years.

2. Most people don’t know how to respect those with whom they disagree.

And for this playful artist…

1. Both Presidential and ‘Veep’ candidates will be fun to caricature over the next 4 years!

As this election cycle closes, I find myself thankful that it’s over, weary of what it entailed, and hopeful for what is to come – and that’s regardless of whom I voted for. Two years for a campaign is too much… too much money, too much mudslinging, and too much manipulation. Each campaign attempts to manipulate us by promoting desired images, but not necessarily reality. Last I could tell, neither the Messiah, the anti-Christ, nor “George W” was running; neither Biden nor Palin was an idiot; and no administration has been a complete failure.

Let’s move ahead, being respectful of our leaders. Let’s get rid of using the word “hate.” And let’s engage in respectful dialogue in this country, remembering above all else that we pledge ourselves to be one nation under God, with liberty and justice for all.

Time to run… need to find that sketch pad…
_____

What I wrote that day remains true eight years later. Change the year… change the candidates… buy a new sketch pad for caricatures. Regardless, my concern remains the same…

Do we get it? Do we truly understand?…

Do we understand that we are damaging relationships in our political disrespect?

Do we understand that surrounding ourselves with the likeminded is not a key to wisdom?

Do we understand that none of us have this all figured out?

And do we understand that no candidate takes the place of who God is and the plans he has for any nation?

Eight years later, I stand here, hoping for more… hoping we understand…

Respectfully…
AR

humble enough to limit service

photo-1456431063673-c7c7e8bab74f

While our current societal state seems rife with disagreement, one thing most agree upon is that our political system is broken. It’s inefficient. It’s too much…

… too much money… too much spending… too much obstruction… too much manipulation of the rules… too much gerrymandering… too much partisanship… too much arrogance… too much lying… too much division… too much disrespect… too much rhetoric… too much secrecy… too much corruption… too much special interest… too much.

Regardless of what happens on Election Day, the American government will remain broken until we solve the “too much.” What’s the solution? Some contend it’s campaign finance reform. Others boast if only we all agreed that their party should possess all power.

My sense is that it starts with something far more simple. It starts by reminding the elect that they are public servants — not career politicians. Public servants do not forget whom they serve; career politicians tend to serve party, special interest, and often self.

We need to remind the elect that they are not the elite. We need to remind them that they are citizens just like the rest of us, putting on their pants — or pantsuits (hardeeharhar) — the same leg at a time. Let me thus strongly advocate this day for term limits. I believe we need to limit how long our legislators can spend in elected office.

One of the things I’ve learned in recent years is that when you realize a season or experience is limited, you’re more intentional during that time. You don’t take it for granted. You’re more apt to handle it wisely and well.

Term limits would keep our Senators and Representatives humbler, reminding them that they are not God’s gift to us. It would emphasize the servant aspect of their position. As stated by Dan Greenberg, a nonprofit executive and former member of the Arkansas House of Representatives:

  • Term limits counterbalance incumbent advantages.
  • Term limits secure Congress’s independent judgment.
  • Term limits are a reality check.
  • Term limits minimize members’ incentives for reelection-related “pork- barrel” legislation.
  • Term limits would restore respect for Congress.

We certainly could use more respect for Congress.

Interestingly, term limit polling continually shows an overwhelming majority of us support such a measure. Note that the only substantial opposition comes from incumbent politicians and special interest groups; that should tell us something. Special interest groups/lobbyists want to keep “their people” in power. Said convicted-for-extensive-corruption, lobbyist Jack Abramoff, “As a lobbyist, I was completely against term limits, and I know a lot of people are against term limits, and I was one of the leaders, because why? As a lobbyist, once you buy a congressional office, you don’t have to re-buy that office in six years, right?” Again, that should tell us something. It should tell us lots.

Note the following:

  • Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) has spent over 51 years in office.
  • Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is in year 45 of office.
  • Sen. Thad Cochran (R- MS) — combining his Senate and House tenure — is in year 43.
  • Rep. Don Young (R-AK) is also in year 43.
  • Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has been in office for 41 straight years.
  • His counterpart, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) has served the exact same amount of time.
  • Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) has been in the Senate and House over 40 years.
  • Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) have both served for 39.

I thank the above for their public service. However, I desire the promise, independence, creativity, objectivity, and respect that new congressmen would infuse into our current inefficient political system. We’ve put up with it for too long. It’s too much.

Let’s talk to those who represent us…

Want to represent us well? Then start by being humble enough to limit how long you serve.

Respectfully…
AR

wanna fight?

photo-1470936972859-25f4c18b7479

What should we fight about?

C’mon… what should it be?

Cubs/Indians? Indians/Cubs? (… although for the time being, that’s already been decided… Congratulations, Cubs’ fans…)

How about Clinton/Trump? Or Trump/Clinton?

Or how about how one has so much more integrity than the other?

Friends, stop. Could we agree to quit fighting? Because if we can’t agree — and if we can’t agree to respect the person who thinks differently than we do — what do you think is going to happen next Wednesday — when the vote is done? Do we honestly expect the outcome to silence all dissent? Should it? Should we actually rationalize not listening to another?

By this point, most people seem to have made up their mind (… well, not this semi-humble current events observer — but I do have until Tuesday…). Each person’s vote is valid, no less. Each person’s…

Because each person’s vote is valid, we face disagreement. Unfortunately, many of us then also face fierce attempts to silence us or shut up. Let’s be clear: those attempts don’t further dialogue; they don’t build solution; they are not wise or respectful; and by no means do they equate to loving your neighbor well.

For those who are voting based on party platform, policy, or potential Supreme Court justices, the vote is clear. May they exercise their right to vote and sleep well on Tuesday night. For those whose vote is based on character or the perceived integrity of the candidates, the choice is more ambiguous. Note the most recent ABC News/Washington Post poll released Monday morning; 60% of voters view Hillary Clinton unfavorably; 58% see the same in Donald Trump. We are bothered; there are good people who are seriously, soberly bothered by the thought of a President Trump — or —  of another President Clinton.

We are bothered by the so-called “October surprises” — these incidents and events that are announced or occur in the month before the election, often making one candidate look especially bad… like George W. Bush’s announced DUI (that happened 24 years earlier)… like Pres. William Howard Taft’s 1912 reelection ticket, when his Vice Presidential candidate died one week prior to the election… or like in 1840, when federal prosecutors charged “big Whigs” opposing Pres. Martin Van Buren with fraud in the preceding weeks.

This year, we’ve been “surprised” by Donald Trump’s 2005 crude comments about women and Hillary Clinton’s ongoing, criminal email investigation. We hear more claims that we can’t tell if they are true or untrue from WikiLeaks. Again, good people are bothered. Different things bother different people, but the bottom line (from my very limited vantage point) is something along the lines of: ugh… the perceived lack of integrity is dripping.

Yet here’s the inherent challenge. One of the above two candidates — barring something unforeseen — will become the nation’s 45th President. While no candidate has an unblemished ethical record, most of us will still choose to vote for one of the above. In other words, most of us will choose to vote for someone — whether we personally hold the same belief or not — whose integrity is in question by unprecedented multitudes.

And so here is my plea…

Remembering that each is perceived as something less than ethical, let us stop fighting and refrain from judgment.

Just like the Indians and Cubs, there is a time to stop fighting, shake hands, and congratulate the other.

Can we do that?

Can we further dialogue, build solution, be respectful, and truly love our neighbor well?

I know it’s hard… even among good people.

Respectfully…
AR